Wasted food contributes to climate change

Approximately one out of every four calories produced to feed people is actually consumed.

Mike Blake/Reuters/File
Tyson foods Inc and Hillshire Brands Jimmy Dean sausages are shown in this photo illustration in Encinitas, Calif.

Approximately one out of every four calories produced to feed people is not consumed. A 2016 report by the United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP) says that about 40 percent of the total estimated food losses and waste in North America are a result of consumer behavior.

Recently, food waste, defined as food that is thrown away before or after it spoils, has been placed on the forefront of Americans’ minds. According to Rethink Food Waste Through Economics and Data (ReFED), awareness has increased for many reasons: to combat environmental degradation while feeding a growing population, to fix economic inefficiencies in the food supply chain, and to reduce greenhouse gas emissions coming from landfills.

A U.S. survey by the International Food Information Council Foundation explored why food waste happens at the consumer level. According to the results, eaters either forget about perishable food until it’s too late (19 percent), buy too much fresh or perishable food (17 percent), cook big meals and throw away leftovers (8 percent), or serve themselves portions that are too big (7 percent).

To put food waste into perspective, ReFED published the Roadmap to Reduce U.S. Food Waste by 20 percent in 2016. The report provides a helpful visual, “If all of our country’s wasted food was grown in one place, it would cover roughly 80 million acres, over 75 percent of the state of California, and consume all the water used in California, Texas, and Ohio combined. The mega-farm would harvest enough food to fill a 40-ton tractor every 20 seconds. Many of those trailers would distribute food to grocery stores…instead of being purchased, this perfectly good food would be loaded onto another line of trucks and hauled to a landfill.”

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) declared that uneaten food in landfills accounts for roughly 20 percent of U.S. methane emissions. Plus, methane is about 27 times as potent as carbon dioxide at trapping heat. According to a 2016 study conducted by the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK), greenhouse gas emissions related to the food supply quadrupled during the last 50 years. The EPA emphasizes the problem—food is now the second-largest source of methane emission in the U.S.

The Think.Eat.Save campaign is a great example of what consumers can do to conserve food and prevent waste. This campaign, founded by Save Food as a joint initiative between UNEP, the U.N. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), and Messe Düsseldorf, provides consumers, retailers, and communities with advice on ways to reduce their food waste. Additionally, Think.Eat.Save advocates for food conservation in other ways, like policy recommendations.

In general, learning about the problem and taking action is one of the best ways to reduce food waste. For the average consumer, ReFED cited education as the most important way to significantly reduce food waste.

This story originally appeared on Food Tank.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.