New study suggests Americans could feed more people by changing their diet

Reducing meat consumption in the standard American diet can raise the potential of agricultural land to feed more people, study finds.

J. Scott Applewhite/AP/File
Steaks and other beef products are displayed for sale at a grocery store in McLean, Va., Jan. 18, 2010.

The United States uses 630 million hectares of land for food production. If Americans adopt a vegetarian diet that includes dairy, this land could feed 800 million people, according to a new study from the Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy at Tufts University. The study, which was published in July 2016, uses a new foodprint model to show the relationship between dietary choices and per capita land requirements on existing agricultural land in the U.S. The results indicate that reducing meat consumption—in comparison to the standard American diet—can raise the potential of agricultural land to feed more people. The study is the first of its scale which estimates the carrying capacity of existing agricultural land in the entire continental U.S.

The researchers used 10 diet scenarios: one baseline, average American diet; a baseline diet which falls within suggested caloric intake, based on the 2010 Dietary Guidelines from the U.S. Department of Agriculture; and eight diet variations which abide by the 2010 dietary guidelines. The eight diets differ in the amount of meat and dairy, ranging from a purely vegan scenario to a scenario wherein 100 percent of the population consumes meat.

The study finds that the baseline diet has the highest land use, at 1.08 hectares per person, per year. On the other end of the spectrum, the three vegetarian diet scenarios reach as low as 0.13 hectares per person, per year. When per capita land requirements for each diet scenario are applied to the available agricultural land in the U.S.—including cultivated cropland, perennial cropland, and grazing land—the resulting carrying capacity indicates how many people can be fed. According to the study’s authors, “the estimates of carrying capacity for each scenario suggest that dietary choices can greatly influence the ability of agriculture to meet human food needs.”

The authors note, however, that the land use varies between diet scenarios: diets with higher amounts of meat used all of the available cropland and grazing land, while the vegetarian diets did not use any grazing land. The report also notes that the carrying capacity of the vegan diet scenario depends on estimates of the quantity of arable cropland.

This story originally appeared on Food Tank.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to New study suggests Americans could feed more people by changing their diet
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today