A Rio soup kitchen tackles Olympics food waste

RefettoRio Gastromotiva is highlighting the issue of food waste during the Olympics, where the soup kitchen is projected to recover twelve tons of surplus food.

Adrees Latif/Reuters/File
People play soccer on Copacabana Beach in Rio de Janeiro, August 18, 2016.

Massimo Bottura is a world-renowned Italian chef and founder of the non-profit Food for Soul, which works with public and private organizations to generate awareness about food waste and hunger. Bottura's non-profit partnered with Gastromotiva, a non-profit based in Brazil, to develop the soup kitchen RefettoRio Gastromotiva. Bottura hopes that RefettoRio Gastromotiva will highlight the issue of food waste during the Olympics, where the soup kitchen is projected to recover twelve tons of surplus food.

Bottura will work with a team of celebrity chefs from France, Spain, and Brazil to craft an estimated total of 19k meals. The chefs’ creations will be free in an effort to address both waste and poverty.

“We have an opportunity with this project, which is cultural, and not a charitable project, to fight wastefulness. If we change the way people think, we can help give birth to a new tradition,” Bottura declared at a press conference. The project will continue after the Olympics, as Rio city hall allowed RefettoRio Gastromotiva to remain on the site, free of charge, for ten years. It will operate as a restaurant-school, offering workshops on nutrition and healthy food choices.

In addition to Rio, Bottura has pursued his goal of reducing waste and using it to feed others at the Expo Milano in 2015, and earlier this year in Turin, Italy. He hopes that his projects will motivate other communities to follow in his footsteps.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.