How much longer will Coca-Cola and Pepsi be 'soda' companies?

Coca-Cola unveiled a new look for its soda products Tuesday, marketing varieties like Diet Coke and Coca-Cola as part of a single, unified brand. The change comes as Coca-Cola and Pepsi try to adapt to consumers buying less and less soda. 

The Coca-Cola Company via AP
This photo provided by The Coca-Cola Company shows the new appearance of Coca-Cola bottles. Coca-Cola says it is giving cans and bottles of its flagship sodas a makeover, with plans to unify the appearance of regular Coke, Diet Coke, Coke Zero and Coke Life.

Coca-Cola is getting a makeover.

The soda company announced Tuesday that it will be unifying its products under a “One Brand” marketing strategy in order to create a cohesive look across global markets. It’s also joining others in the soda business in recognizing the need to adapt to consumers’ changing tastes.

As part of the design change, Coca-Cola products will feature a red disk and graphics that clearly identify each individual Coke option while integrating them into a more cohesive, single brand. Under the new look, options like Diet Coke, Coca-Cola Zero, and Coca-Cola Classic look less like individual products and more like pieces of a set. 

The “One Brand” strategy is scheduled to roll out first in Mexico, and will land in other markets throughout 2016 and into 2017.

Coca-Cola said that the design change is part of a move to more clearly signal to consumers which Coke products will fit their lifestyles. Although soda and soft drinks still account for 73 percent of Coca-Cola’s core market, that number is declining as consumers move away from sugary beverages.

And it's not the only beverage company faced with adapting to a changing clientele. On Monday, PepsiCo CEO Indra Nooyi said that soda now accounts for less than 25 percent of the company’s global sales, with just 12 percent coming from sales of Pepsi soda. Instead, PepsiCo relies more heavily on “everyday nutrition” items, like bottled water and its snack foods division, even prompting some debate on Twitter over whether the company should change its name altogether. 

For both Coke and Pepsi, a shift away from their soda-centric identities is crucial to their survival. In 1998, the average American drank 56 gallons of soda annually. By 2014, it was 42 gallons, according to Beverage Digest. Soda sales have declined each of the last 11 years.

With One Brand, Coca-Cola is navigating the shift while trying to preserve Coke's status as a household name, Amy Bentley, a professor of Food Studies at New York University, tells the Monitor in a phone interview. 

“They’re not changing what’s iconic, the red brand and lettering, and that’s one of the most hugely recognized brand images around,” she explains. “[One Brand is] tweaking what’s already a very successful brand icon to keep consumer interest. Soda consumption is going down, [and] both Coke and Pepsi are expanding their product lines to compensate with that.”

In a press release, James Sommerville, Coca-Cola’s Vice President of Global Design, said the new brand strategy “utilizes a historical brand icon to present the range of Coca-Cola products available today in a contemporary and simple way.”

Soda's decline stems in large part from increased public awareness about obesity, in which experts contend sugary drinks have played a large part. In response, Coke and Pepsi have made concessions, such as introducing smaller beverage containers as an alternative to full-size soda bottles and no longer marketing soda directly to children.

But some regulators and public health advocates argue those reforms aren't enough. Kathleen Keller, an assistant professor in the Department of Nutritional Sciences and Food Science at Penn State University, tells the Monitor in a phone interview that too many food companies are instead using their ad dollars to merely market different sugary options to children. 

“If you ask companies…the data that they cite for that is saying that they’re not advertising soda to kids as much, but what you see is that they’re not advertising soda, but they are advertising sugar-sweetened beverages in the form of teas or juice drinks. They are essentially just shifting the advertising dollars to other products in their portfolio,”she says.

Dr. Keller explains that the way children respond to food brands they recognize can have a tremendous influence on their eating habits.

“Kids don’t know the purpose of advertising is to sell them a product,” she says. “They think it’s fun, it’s supposed to be entertaining and rewarding… but they don’t necessarily know what the purpose is behind it.”

Advocates say that public measures, like soda taxes to discourage consumption, are more effective. The idea has faced considerable opposition in the United States. Berkeley, California is the only city in the US to have successfully voted in a soda tax. But Mexico’s soda tax has coincided with 12-percent decline in soda sales since it was implemented in 2014. In March, Britain announced that it will also introduce a soda tax to curb childhood obesity. The British government has said that one in five English children is obese by the time they leave primary school.       

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to How much longer will Coca-Cola and Pepsi be 'soda' companies?
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today