Why restaurants don't want customers ordering dessert

To turn a profit, some restaurants would rather you leave than finish your meal off with crème brûlée.

|
Tommy Martino/AP
Jessica Brown decorates Super Bowl cookies at Rykes Bakery, Catering & Cafe in Muskegon, Mich.,has held the competition since 2008. This year, in addition to cookies with logos of the New England Patriots and Seattle Seahawks, there's a third option: Cookies decorated with deflated footballs.

Have you ever noticed that waiters may ask if you are interested in dessert rather than placing the menu tantalizingly in front of you?

That's because they would really rather you didn’t get that brownie sundae. Restaurants operate on thin margins, and something as simple as a dessert can push them over the economic edge.

"It's hard to make money on desserts in the restaurant business today," said Tyler Cowen, an economics professor at George Mason University who has written extensively about the economics of eating out, to the Washington Post. "I don't think many [restaurants] benefit when people order them anymore."

While it has always been difficult to turn a profit selling food, the restaurant industry survives by squeezing mark-ups onto as many items as possible, particularly drinks. But with desserts that is difficult to do. The ingredients are often not cheap because the finished product needs to taste good. However, customers are rarely willing to pay for expensive desserts after spending so much money on the rest of the meal, so desserts are often priced lower than they are worth.

But it isn’t just about the check. Many busy restaurants only profit by turning tables over as quickly as possible.

"The more people they serve the more revenue they get," Cowen said. "A lot of restaurant costs are fixed. Being able to serve more people, to sell them food, drinks, and especially expensive wine, is what varies."

Ordering dessert wastes time and doesn’t make all that much difference on the bill. Unless the customer orders higher-margin items after dinner, restaurants are losing money when customers stay the extra half hour for dessert.

Having a nice dessert menu also requires that a restaurant employ a pastry chef and designate a separate kitchen area. To avoid this extra cost, some owners outsource their desserts to outside bakeries that already have the necessary staff and space.

“You give them your recipes and they’ll make them for you. That way you can still say that they’re your desserts,” Mark Bucher, who owns Medium Rare in Washington D.C, told the Washingtonian.

Some restaurants that can’t afford to outsource keep desserts simple so the line cooks can make them in the morning and store them in the refrigerator throughout the day. That's why frozen cheesecake, pudding, and glorified Jell-O have become staple desserts at many restaurants. With such uninspiring desserts, customers don’t necessarily even want to stay.

The dessert dilemma is mainly a problem for busy middle-of-the-road restaurants, since high-end restaurants have reputations that allow them to charge more per dish and slower restaurants do not need to turn tables over as quickly.

But the dessert industry as a whole is doing fine, according to restaurant critic Todd Kliman, just not in restaurants.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Why restaurants don't want customers ordering dessert
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Business/The-Bite/2015/0210/Why-restaurants-don-t-want-customers-ordering-dessert
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe