Post UK election, policies both parties may agree on

While the dueling parties still don't have a solution to the hung parliament result after the UK election, there are two policies they are likely to agree on. Will the triumphant party reach across lines to pass these measures?

Simon Dawson/AP
Britain's Liberal Democrat leader Nick Clegg speaks to the media outside his home in London on Tuesday. Mr. Clegg said he is anxious to resolve Britain's political impasse, but will whoever wins the most seats reach across the isle and pass these proposals?

As the bargaining gathers pace between the possible coalition partners, both are looking for possible areas of agreement. Of more importance are the areas they disagree on, and on which neither would wish to compromise. The Conservatives are unlikely to modify their support for Trident, or the Liberal-Democrats their endorsement of voting reform.

There are two policies, however, both advocated by the Adam Smith Institute, on which agreement might be reached almost immediately. The first is for a lifting of the starting threshold for income tax to £12,000. The thinking behind it is that those earning the minimum wage or less than half the average wage should not be charged income tax at all – they have enough problems making ends meet as it is.

This runs totally counter to Gordon Brown’s view that he should decide how much tax everyone pays, combining high taxes on low earners with tax credits to reimburse then. It is a system that makes everyone a state dependent, with welfare even going to those earning 50 percent more than the average income.

The ASI has advocated a high threshold for years, long before the Liberal-Democrats came out for a somewhat lower threshold of £10,000. This would be a good time for the Conservatives to accept what we have told them many times: poor people should not be paying tax.

The second ASI policy they could both agree on is to set up a one-year judicial review of the state of civil liberties in Britain. Following years of legislation inimical to the freedoms we once took for granted, and thought enshrined in our unwritten constitution, a thorough review is needed.

A senior law officer, sitting for a year, taking evidence in public, would identify the areas of concern and make recommendations accordingly. Proceedings would be televised, giving expert evidence night after night on TV about what recent legislation has done to our legal protections.

Although the government would not be bound by the review’s recommendations, there would be powerful moral pressure for them to be enacted, going some way to restoring our lost liberties.

These are two policies to help the next government, both easy to agree upon. In the coming weeks, the ASI will be putting forward many more proposals which can similarly secure wide support, and help turn Britain back from its recent ruinous course.

Add/view comments on this post.


The Christian Science Monitor has assembled a diverse group of the best economy-related bloggers out there. Our guest bloggers are not employed or directed by the Monitor and the views expressed are the bloggers' own, as is responsibility for the content of their blogs. To contact us about a blogger, click here. To add or view a comment on a guest blog, please go to the blogger's own site by clicking on the link above.

of stories this month > Get unlimited stories
You've read of 5 free stories

Only $1 for your first month.

Get unlimited Monitor journalism.