Reform the Child Tax Credit for low-income workers

The rules in place today for the Child Tax Credit offer the best benefits for low-income families compared to alternative plans. Maintaining the current rules may be the best option.

J. Scott Applewhite/AP/File
Extending the $1,000 child tax credit and marriage penalty relief, President Bush signs the Working Families Tax Relief Act of 2004 during an event at the South Suburban YMCA in Des Moines, Iowa, Monday, Oct. 4, 2004. New alternatives may not offer as many benefits for low-income families.

Congress could significantly help low-income families with children by making current eligibility rules for the Child Tax Credit (CTC) permanent. If lawmakers allow the current threshold to expire as scheduled after 2017, families with children in the lowest income quintile will lose almost $700. Over the past few years, members of Congress from both sides of the aisle have proposed expanding the credit in a variety of ways– but none of those alternatives would benefit low-income families as efficiently as maintaining today’s rules.

The CTC provides a credit of up to $1,000 per child under age 17. Parents with little or no tax liability receive a refundable credit of 15 cents per dollar of earnings over $3,000 – until they reach their credit maximum. After the current rules expire in two years, a family’s earnings would have to reach almost $15,000 before they could begin receiving the refundable credit.

The CTC’s refundability is rarely an issue for high-income families since their tax liability generally exceeds the maximum credit. But a higher threshold would seriously hurt low-income families.

The Tax Policy Center estimates that in 2018 an extended threshold would benefit about 68 percent of all families with children, including roughly 80 percent of all families with children in the lowest income quintile. But if the threshold expires, only 58 percent of all families with children—and only 38 percent of low-income families with children— would receive CTC benefits.

The average amount of CTC benefits would also decline significantly for families with children in the lowest income quintile from about $1,050 under today’s rules to about $370 if the threshold expires.

Over the past year, lawmakers have suggested several other ways to reform the CTC.  Representative Jenkins (R-KS) proposed indexing the credit and expanding it to higher income families. That plan would cost about the same as extending the current rules, but its benefits would flow almost exclusively to families in the top 40 percent of the income distribution. Presidential hopeful Marco Rubio would create an additional $2,500 credit. His plan is much more expensive than extending the current threshold, but it would do almost nothing for the lowest-income families.

Proponents of the various reforms argue their plans would help families. But lower-income households, would be far better off if Congress simply continues today’s rules beyond 2017.

This article first appeared at TaxVox.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Reform the Child Tax Credit for low-income workers
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today