EITC compliance could improve with regulation

Most low-income families that are benefiting from the Earned Income Tax Credit need the help of a paid preparer. These perparers can make mistakes at the expense of the families. Regulation may help stop this.

Andrew Harnik/AP/File
This photo taken Aug. 19, 2015 shows the The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Building in Washington. The IRS could introduce increased regulation to increase compliance with the EITC.

Tax preparers play a critical role helping low income working families collect benefits from the Earned Income Tax Credit. Almost 60 percent of families claiming the EITC in 2010 and 2011 did so with the help of a paid preparer. Unfortunately, preparers can make costly mistakes—errors the taxpayer is ultimately responsible for resolving. The IRS could help to protect these families—and prevent some overpayments—by imposing minimum competency and qualification standards for authorized tax preparers. But first, Congress must give IRS the authority to regulate preparers, a step lawmakers say they support but have not yet taken.

The EITC provides substantial assistance to low-income working families – particularly those with children – delivering about $60 billion in benefits annually. The credit rises with income, levels off, and then eventually declines with further increases in income. The maximum benefit a family with one child can receive in 2015 is $3,359. Families with at least three children can receive up to $6,242.

Using data from its National Research Program from tax year 2009, the IRS estimates the level of overclaimed EITC payments for fiscal year 2013 was between 22 percent and 26 percent of total EITC program payments. The biggest reason:  complicated qualifying child rules. And often, paid preparers made the mistakes. Lower bound estimates from an IRS compliance study showed 44 percent of EITC returns prepared by a paid preparer contained at least one error – totaling 29 percent of all the EITC payments claimed on those returns.

Today, many paid firms and individuals can claim to be qualified to file returns for others without ever meeting minimum competency standards. Some erroneous returns are produced by unscrupulous preparers hoping to inflate a client’s EITC, which could, not incidentally, boost the preparer’s fees. But often, preparers make mistakes because they don’t fully understand the complex tax code.  Regulation could help reduce those mistakes the most.

In 2010, IRS began a program designed to certify paid preparers who met minimum competency standards. But before the program could be fully implemented, an appeals court held that the IRS lacked authority to regulate some preparers. Since then, the agency and many on Capitol Hill have tried to convince Congress to give IRS power to regulate all preparers.  But faced with opposition from some preparers, who argue the legislation would give the agency too much authority, the measure has stalled—most recently in the Senate Finance Committee.

Congress should act, both to help protect low-income workers from EITC errors and to strengthen the credit’s integrity. But If Congress doesn’t do anything, it shouldn’t be surprised when it learns next year that the IRS is still overpaying credits.

This article first appeared at TaxVox.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to EITC compliance could improve with regulation
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today