Automakers ask government to relax some rules for self-driving cars

General Motors, Toyota, and Volvo are among the carmakers who told a House committee that granting exemptions for self-driving cars to test on public roadways could help them and tech firms speed development.

Eric Risberg/AP
A Google self-driving car is seen on display Wednesday, May 18, 2016, at Google's I/O conference in Mountain View, Calif.

A tangled web of state laws could make it more difficult to test self-driving cars soon, representatives from automotive companies told a congressional committee Tuesday.

Spokespeople from automakers such as General Motors, Toyota, and Volvo, and representatives from ride-sharing company Lyft and a leading think tank told a House committee that granting exemptions for self-driving cars to test on public roadways could help automakers and tech firms speed development.

“Everyone should have (self-driving cars) available to them," Lyft Vice President for Government Relations Joseph Okpaku told House Representatives.

According to testimony from a subcommittee of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, more than 50 bills are winding their way through state legislatures regarding self-driving cars, and although they haven't yet hampered development or testing, automakers say that they could soon.

Specifically, automakers are looking for relief from a Department of Transportation mandate that test vehicles meet minimum safety standards. Many of those standards include driver controls that automakers and ride-sharing services say are redundant and could add costs to development.

Anders Karrberg, a Volvo vice president for governmental affairs, said his company was preparing a full-size Volvo XC90 to be SAE Level 4 compliant by 2021. That would mean that the SUV could operate independently, without driver input or attention, on certain roadways in certain conditions.

Testing those cars could be difficult without a formalized waiver process from federal agencies that could allow Volvo to test that technology, regardless of state.

Automotive representatives told the committee that the technology could save thousands of lives if implemented, but added that the sensors and software could add tens of thousands of dollars to the cars and would likely be initially reserved for fleet or ride-sharing services that could amortize the costs of those in their cars.

In September, the NHTSA issued preliminary guidelines for autonomous vehicles, but setting conditions for a waiver program to forgo some current mandates hasn't yet been finalized. House Representatives considered allowing some rules to be relaxed for certain conditions—i.e. whether the self-driving cars would be used on public roadways or on closed roads—while others would stay in place.

This story originally appeared on MotorAuthority.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.