What Trump's action on financial advisor rule means for retirement savers

President Trump might do away with a new rule that requires financial advisors and brokers who provide advice on retirement accounts to act in the best interests of their clients over their own.

Robert Galbraith/Reuters/File
Helen Ramos of Fairfield, Calif., shakes hands with financial advisor Tai Mamea following a counseling event for homeowners applying for mortgage modifications in Oakland, Calif.

The future of the fiduciary rule, which was intended to benefit retirement savers, is in doubt after President Donald Trump called for its review Friday just two months before it was to go into effect.

The rule would have required financial advisors and brokers who provide advice for retirement accounts to be fiduciaries, meaning they must act in the best interests of their clients over their own. For example, it would have prohibited brokers from steering clients to products that didn’t suit their needs — such as those that charge high commissions.

What does this mean for you?

Trump’s directive puts consumer protections that were on the way for traditional and Roth IRAs, 401(k)s and some health savings accounts into question.

At minimum, this means consumers must do their own due diligence before hiring financial advisors and brokers. That includes researching an advisor or brokerage firm before hiring them and choosing one that already acts as a fiduciary.

Consumers should also ask questions about commissions and fees, and be mindful that even small percentages can add up to tens of thousands of dollars over a few decades of saving for retirement.

And consumers can now invest through robo-advisors, or automated online advisors. These services use computer algorithms to manage assets for a fraction of what a human advisor would charge.

Why the review?

Trump’s action directs the Department of Labor to review the fiduciary rule, and some who applaud the move say it could be a preliminary step to killing the regulation altogether. The president’s memorandum on the matter specifically mentioned this possibility.

At the signing, U.S. Rep. Ann Wagner, R-Mich., said Trump’s action was about Main Street. “What we’re doing is we are returning to the American people, low- and middle- income investors, and retirees, their control of their own retirement savings. This is a big day, a big moment for Americans who care to invest and save.”

Within the financial industry, there has been opposition to the rule. Some industry officials argue it would restrict investor choice and increase costs without providing the intended consumer protection.

Many consumer advocates disagree, saying the delay could be a blow to consumers. “The American investor needs protection from financial advisors who may not have their best interests at heart,’’ Julian Rubinstein, CEO and president of American Asset Management, a Florida-based advisor that manages more than 500 portfolios, said in a statement. “This is like telling medical doctors not to practice the best medicine that they can.”

Anna-Louise Jackson is a staff writer at NerdWallet, a personal finance website. Email: ajackson@nerdwallet.com.

This story originally appeared on NerdWallet.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.