Major banks fined $3.4B for manipulating currency markets

US British and Swiss regulators have fined five global banks $3.4 billion for attempting to manipulate foreign exchange markets — the latest penalties for an industry previously criticized for their role in triggering the global financial crisis. The Justice Department is conducting their own investigations and further penalties are possible.

Stefan Wermuth/AP/File
People walk past a Citibank branch in the City of London November 12, 2014. US, British and Swiss regulators have fined five global banks $3.4 billion for attempting to manipulate foreign exchange markets.

U.S., British and Swiss regulators have fined five global banks $3.4 billion for attempting to manipulate foreign exchange markets — the latest penalties for an industry previously criticized for rigging interest rates and for their role in triggering the global financial crisis.

The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission, the U.K. Financial Conduct Authority and the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority said Wednesday that Citibank, JPMorgan Chase Bank, Royal Bank of Scotland, HSBC Bank and UBS had agreed to settlements totaling almost $3.4 billion. The FCA said it is continuing to investigate Barclays Bank.

"Today's record fines mark the gravity of the failings we found, and firms need to take responsibility for putting it right," said Martin Wheatley, chief executive of the FCA. "They must make sure their traders do not game the system to boost profits."

Some $5.3 trillion changes hands every day on the global foreign exchange market, with 40 percent of trades occurring in London. Currencies including dollars, pounds, euros and yen trade in the loosely regulated market dominated by a group of elite banks. But those trades have an even wider impact because companies around the world use market prices to value assets and manage currency risks.

The regulators found that between Jan. 1, 2008 and Oct. 15, 2013, the five banks failed to adequately train and supervise foreign currency traders. As a result, traders were able to form groups that shared information about client activity, using nicknames such as "the players, "the 3 musketeers" and "1team, 1 dream."

"Traders shared the information obtained through these groups to help them work out their trading strategies," the FCA said in a statement. "They then attempted to manipulate fix rates and trigger client 'stop loss' orders." Stop loss orders limit client losses in the face of adverse currency movements.

The traders tried to manipulate the market to ensure that their banks made a profit, the Financial Conduct Authority said.

"It is completely unacceptable ... for firms to engage in attempts at manipulation for their own benefit and to the potential detriment of certain clients and other market participants," the U.K. regulator said.

RBS Chairman Philip Hampton said the bank accepted the criticism and condemned the actions of the employees responsible.

"Today is a stark reminder of the importance of culture and integrity in banking and we will rightly be judged on the strength of our response," Hampton said in a statement.

RBS has started disciplinary action against six employees, three of whom have been suspended.

The Bank of England conducted a separate inquiry into the role of its officials in the foreign exchange market. The investigation by outside attorneys found no evidence that the central bank was involved in unlawful or improper behavior but it said its chief foreign exchange dealer was aware that traders were sharing information.

From at least Nov. 28, 2012, the bank's chief dealer had concerns this could involve "collusive behavior," but failed to notify his superiors.

"This was an error of judgment for which he should be criticized," the investigator, Anthony Grabiner, said in his report. Grabiner stressed the dealer did not act in bad faith and was not involved in unlawful or improper behavior.

The U.S. Department of Justice and other authorities are conducting their own investigations and further penalties are possible. Barclays said in a statement that "after discussions with other regulators and authorities," it decided to seek a more general coordinated settlement."

Regulators in Britain, Switzerland, the U.S. and Asia have been investigating the banks' conduct for months, and negotiating settlements with the banks.

For their part, the banks already had factored in the prospect of heavy fines by putting money aside to cover the cost. Citigroup took a $600 million charge while JPMorgan Chase & Co. about $400 million. Barclays, HSBC and Royal Bank of Scotland similarly set aside hundreds of millions of dollars.

The foreign-exchange scandal again lifts the curtain on misconduct in the banking world and is the latest black eye for big international banks. Five big banks — including Britain's Lloyds, Barclays and Royal Bank of Scotland — have been sanctioned for alleged manipulation of a key global interest rate in a continuing investigation. The five banks together have paid nearly $4 billion in settlements, and several individuals have been criminally charged by U.S. authorities.

The London interbank offered rate, known as LIBOR, is used by banks to borrow from each other and affects trillions of dollars in contracts around the world, including mortgages, bonds and consumer loans.

Major Wall Street banks including JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America and Citigroup have each paid billions of dollars in settlements with the Justice Department and other U.S. agencies over their role in selling the toxic mortgage securities that fueled the worst financial crisis since the 1930s and threw millions of homes into foreclosure.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.