Unemployment benefits for long-term jobless unworkable: Boehner

Unemployment benefits renewal would create difficulties, according to states administering the unemployment benefits. House Speaker Boehner leaves open a possible future compromise over the renewal outlined in a bipartisan Senate bill. 

|
J. Scott Applewhite/AP/File
Sen. Jack Reed (D) of Rhode Island (center) confers with Sen. Dean Heller (R) of Nevada (right), negotiators of a bipartisan bill to renew long-term unemployment benefits, confer in February. Sen. Robert Menendez (D) of New Jersey is at far left.

Bipartisan Senate legislation to renew benefits for the long-term unemployed is unworkable, House Speaker John Boehner said Wednesday as aides circulated a letter from state officials envisioning a series of difficulties they would encounter in administering the measure.

The speaker did not say flatly that the House would shelve the bill if it clears the Senate, leaving open the possibility of a future compromise. But a blog posting by his aides quoted the Ohio Republican as saying there was "no evidence that the bill being rammed through the Senate by (Majority) Leader (Harry) Reid" would help create more private sector jobs.

In response, a spokesman for Reid, Adam Jentleson, said the legislation is bipartisan and the concerns expressed by state officials can be resolved.

"We look forward to Speaker Boehner coming to the table to find solutions," Jentleson said, adding it is "hard to imagine Speaker Boehner simply walking away from the thousands of people in Ohio who lost their jobs through no fault of their own and need this lifeline to make ends meet while they continue to look for work."

In their letter, the National Association of State Workforce Agencies, which administers unemployment benefit programs, said it has "significant concerns about the implementation of the legislation."

The letter added that "some states have indicated they might decide such changes are not feasible in the short time available, and therefore would consider not signing the U.S. Department of Labor's agreement to operate the program."

Among other issues, the letter said most states have outdated computer systems that make it hard to implement any changes to the program quickly, and it's not clear how states would pay for administrative costs if federal funds cannot be spent to determine eligibility.

One of the provisions in the Senate compromise is a prohibition on individuals with million-dollar earnings from earning unemployment benefits.

The letter also cited the potential for a large number of overpayments as a result of the bill's requirement for benefits dating back to the end of last year.

The Senate is expected to debate the measure shortly after it returns on Monday from a weeklong break. Under a compromise announced earlier in the month, a program of benefits would be renewed for five months, effective when it expired on Dec. 28.

The program generally benefited workers laid off more than six months, an estimated 2 million of whom have lost payments since it expired.

The Senate proposal has the support of at least five Republicans, meaning that unless there are Democratic defections, it will have enough support to achieve a 60-vote majority and overcome any GOP stalling tactics. It resulted from lengthy negotiations led by Sens. Jack Reed, D-R.I., and Dean Heller, R-Nev., whose states have among the highest joblessness in the country.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Unemployment benefits for long-term jobless unworkable: Boehner
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Business/Latest-News-Wires/2014/0320/Unemployment-benefits-for-long-term-jobless-unworkable-Boehner
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe