Kim Hong-Ji/Reuters/File
Google Executive Chairman Eric Schmidt speaks at a promotional event for the Nexus 7 tablet in Seoul in this September file photo. Google Inc inadvertently released its draft quarterly results hours ahead of schedule, Oct. 18, 2012, significantly missing expectations on both revenue and earnings and wiping 9 percent off the market value of the Internet search and advertising leader.

Google's big miss highlights Wall Street's big worry

Google isn't the only company reporting disappointing revenues. So far this earnings season, most companies have exceeded profits expectations, but only 42 percent have beaten revenue forecasts.

Google's stunning earnings disappointment on Thursday is a dramatic example of what has become Wall Street's latest worry: revenue is coming in much worse than anyone thought.

Overall this earnings season, third-quarter profits have managed to be a shade better than the doom-and-gloom forecasts.

But company top lines—or the revenue generated that should be driving those bottom-line profit beats—have been even worse this quarter than they were last.

Google, which released results earlier than expected due to a printer error, showed that the Internet-search giant missed on both sales and profits. (Read more:Google Reports Big Earnings Miss)

 The Google results sent the broader market lower, though the damage was most pronounced on the Nasdaq, which lost 1 percent. (Read More: Nasdaq Tumbles on Google Selloff)

 Google's misfortunes raised questions of whether it could be a market game-changer.

 With about one-third of the companies on the Standard & Poor's 500 reporting so far, a healthy 65 percent have beaten the low bar set for profit expectations in the third quarter.

 But while that has been happening, just 42 percent have topped revenue forecasts.

 That is well below the historical average of 62 percent and even worse than the anemic second quarter, which saw a sales beat of just 44 percent. The market has flatlined so far during earnings.

Investors have shown a tendency as the economy works its way back from the financial crisis and ensuing recession that ended in 2009 to reward companies growing revenue and penalize those who fall short even if they beat on profit.

"We think focus will be on the top-line, which was rewarded most for positive surprises last quarter," said Savita Subramanian, equity and quant strategist at Bank of America Merrill Lynch. "With cost structures already lean, sales growth is increasingly important for companies’ ability to grow earnings." (Read More: Earnings Look Better So Far, but Market May Not Care)

Keeping with that line of thinking, the pros at Strategas are advising investors that, based on current trends, the best bet will be to go defensive.

The firm said that when earnings pull back to these levels, economic growth usually takes more than three quarters to rebound.

They recommend a portfolio mix of long technology staples, consumer staples and health care, and short consumer discretionary.

"With the market down  from its September high, defensive shares have retaken leadership relative to cyclicals over the past month," Strategas' Nicholas Bohnsack and Emily Jones said in a note. "We remain in favor of a more defensive allocation for the intermediate term."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Google's big miss highlights Wall Street's big worry
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today