Timothy Geithner pressures SEC to change money-market rules

Timothy Geithner is putting pressure on the Securities and Exchange Commission to overhaul its rules for money-market mutual funds. Geithner warned that without an overhaul to the money-market system, US financial stability would remain threatened. 

Mario Anzuoni/Reuters/File
US Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner speaks during a panel discussion in Los Angeles in this July 2012 file photo. Geithner wants the SEC to overhaul rules for money-market funds, a change that has been pushed for since the 2008 collapse.

Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner is putting pressure on the Securities and Exchange Commission to overhaul its rules for money-market mutual funds.

Geithner sent a letter Thursday to members of the Financial Stability Oversight Council seeking their help in pressuring the SEC to change its rules. Geithner, who heads the panel, said the changes are necessary to protect the system.

SEC Chairman Mary Schapiro has pushed for the changes. But she abandoned them last month because three of the agency's five commissioners oppose new rules.

The changes were sought after a big fund collapsed during the 2008 financial crisis. One proposed change would require funds have capital cushions, like banks.

The SEC would be required to adopt the council's recommended changes or explain why it failed to act.

Money-market funds are a linchpin of the economy, holding $2.7 trillion in assets. Individual investors, corporate treasurers and professional money managers rely on money funds to limit losses when stocks plunge.

The mutual fund industry has vigorously opposed an overhaul of money funds. The industry supported less comprehensive restrictions on the funds that the SEC adopted 2 ½ years ago. But industry leaders warn that further changes would make money funds so unattractive that investors could pull out of them altogether

Geithner said in his letter that if the SEC fails to act "in a timely and effective manner," the council should take its own steps. Those could include designating some money funds as firms that pose a threat to the financial system if they were to fail, he said. That would put those firms under close oversight by the Federal Reserve.

Without an overhaul of money funds, "our financial system will remain vulnerable to runs and instability," Geithner wrote.

A report issued by the oversight council in July identified money funds as one of the risks to U.S. financial stability. The collapse of the Reserve Primary Fund in 2008 created a scare that led the government to temporarily guarantee money fund assets so investors could be assured they would be protected from losses.

Members of the council also include Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke, Schapiro and Martin Gruenberg, acting chairman of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.