Apple iPhone sales fall short, but sales potential intact

While Apple iPhone 5 sales don't hit target of optimists, it's manufacturing capacity – not potential sales – that are the limiting factor, says analyst Brian Marshall. It should take three weeks for Apple to built its 7 millionth iPhone 5. 

Nati Harnik/AP/File
In this Friday file photo, Noah Meloccaro, right, compares his older iPhone 4s to the new iPhone 5 held by Both Gatwech, outside the Apple Store in Omaha, Neb. Apple Inc. said Monday, Sept. 24, 2012, that it sold more than 5 million units of the iPhone 5 in the three days since its launch, less than analysts had expected.

While the sales of Apple’s iPhone 5 fell short of the most optimistic estimates, Brian Marshall of ISI Group said Monday on CNBC that the company’s potential growth was still “100 percent greater.”

 Marshall estimated that there were still “a couple of million units in transit,” based upon the pre-orders of the iPhone 5. “They’ve sold a lot more than 5 million,” he said on “Fast Money.” “We think the story’s intact for sure.”

Marshall said it would take a while to build the all phones that Apple sold in order to reach bullish sales estimates of up to 8 million units.

 “We estimate that they’re currently manufacturing about 275,000 iPhones per day, so to build up 7 million iPhones that takes about three weeks,” he said.

 “Can the market actually take in those phones that they can physically manufacture? Obviously, the answer is yes, and, in fact, they’ll take in a lot more than what they can currently manufacture.”

 Marshall said that in the analysis of all Apple’s 250 telecom carrier partners around the globe, the growth potential for iPhones was “100 percent greater than it is now.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.