Foreclosure hardest on low-income homeowners

Foreclosure is hardest on low-income and minority homeowners, and the gap in foreclosure rates is just the latest indication of a widening rift between rich and poor.

David J. Phillip/AP/File
This file photo shows a bank repo and foreclosure for sale signs outside a foreclosed home in Houston. Foreclosure is most likely to affect low-income homeowners. Such statistics foster growing tensions between the rich and poor, according to a recent survey.

It was only a matter of time before movements like Occupy Wall Street started to bring years of tension between the rich and the poor bubbling to the surface. 

Two-thirds of respondents in a Pew Research Center survey of more than 2,000 consumers said there are "very strong" or "strong" conflicts between the rich and the poor–up 19% from the same report just two years ago. 

That means the beef between the rich and poor now ranks higher than three other historically conflicted groups: immigrants vs. natives, blacks vs. whites and young vs. old. (See how the wealth gap is a really an age gap.)

Unsurprisingly, young adults, women, Democrats and Blacks feel the most disenfranchised when it comes to wealth. They were most likely to perceive conflicts between wealthy Americans and their poor counterparts.

But whites saw the biggest leap this year, with 22% more saying they felt there were class conflicts than in 2009. (See a state-by-state look at America's income distribution.)

"These changes in attitudes over a relatively short period of time may reflect the income and wealth inequality message conveyed by Occupy Wall Street protesters across the country in late 2011 that led to a spike in media attention to the topic," the study says. "But the changes also may also reflect a growing public awareness of underlying shifts in the distribution of wealth in American society." 

Between 2005 and 2009, the richest 10% in the country saw their wealth expand from 49% to 56%. Of those surveyed, the majority said they felt wealthy citizens simply knew the right people or were born into money. 

We don't need Rev. Al Sharpton to tell us just how deeply the recession-fueled gap between low-income minorities and the wealthy has become. 

Mortgage lenders are being scrutinized at every level for lending practices that clearly discriminated against minority and low-income homeowners.

A study released late last year showed minority borrowers were disproportionately stuck with risky subprime loans that came back years later to drag them into foreclosure.

The same report found low-income homeowners were hardest hit by foreclosures, with 7.3 percent having lost their homes to foreclosure since the 2008 housing crisis.

And the ripples will only run deeper, especially as banks make moves this year to start elbowing out consumers with low credit scores. They've already started rolling out new fees on everything from balance transfers to debit card replacements, and are pushing cushy rewards offers to attract consumers with healthy credit. 

See how the Pew survey results stacked up.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.