US household energy spending hits 50-year low

As renewable energy use has expanded significantly over the last decade, household energy costs have declined. That's the conclusion of a new report from the Business Council for Sustainable Energy and Bloomberg New Energy Finance.

Mike Blake/Reuters
Solar installers from Baker Electric place solar panels on the roof of a residential home in Scripps Ranch, San Diego, Calif., on Oct. 14, 2016.

Substantial growth in US renewable-energy capacity will undoubtedly have a positive environmental impact.

But the reduction in carbon emissions renewable-energy advocates aim to achieve does not exclude potential benefits to consumers.

Because as renewable-energy generating capacity has expanded significantly over the last decade, household energy costs have decreased.

That's the conclusion reached in an energy-industry factbook (pdf) published by the Business Council for Sustainable Energy and Bloomberg New Energy Finance.

It showed, among other things, that household spending on energy has dropped to its lowest level as a share of total consumption since records began, in 1960.

The decline has come even as greenhouse gas emissions from energy have been falling over the past decade.

Energy consumption as a share of total household consumption expenditures averaged 3.9 percent in 2016, the first time it has dropped below 4.0 percent since records began, according to the factbook.

At the same time, the factbook's authors say greenhouse-gas emissions from the energy sector shrank 5.3 percent year-on-year in 2016, bringing them to 24.1 percent below 2005 levels.

Total US greenhouse-gas emissions fell to their lowest levels in 25 years last year, according to Bloomberg New Energy Finance.

Shifts in the energy-generation mix saw natural gas eclipse coal to become the largest source of US generating capacity, at 34 percent of the mix.

Coal fell to second place with 30 percent of the generating mix—its lowest share on record.

In comparison, coal's share in 2007 was 49 percent, while natural gas was at 22 percent.

Renewable energy increased from 8 percent to 15 percent of the energy-generating mix in the same period.

Over the last five years, renewable-energy projects have also represented 62 percent of US generating-capacity additions, according to Energy Information Administration and Bloomberg data.

The US is the second-largest global depository for renewable-energy investments, says Bloomberg.

In 2016, utility-scale photovoltaic solar installations reached 8.9 gigawatts, nearly doubling the previous record of 4.4 GW set in 2015.

Last year also saw 7.2 GW of coal-fired power plants retired. That figure does not include plants converted to natural gas or other fuels.

The amount of coal generation capacity retired is important to consider, as it indicates whether new renewable capacity is actually displacing the carbon-intensive fuel, or supplementing it.

This story originally appeared on GreenCarReports.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.