Human drivers will probably bully self-driving cars

In the dawning age of artificial intelligence–like the kind found in self-driving cars–we may begin to bully software, a new study suggests.

Edgar Su/Reuters/File
Media personnel crowd around a driverless car in Singapore.

Bullying has recently become a hot topic of conversation, particularly in schools. But of course, it's been an issue for decades, if not millennia, probably because it's human nature to pick on others who are seen as weak or different.

Sadly, a new study suggests that we may not limit our bullying to other humans. In the dawning age of artificial intelligence–like the kind found in self-driving cars–we may begin to bully software.

The study was conducted by Goodyear and the London School of Economics. Researchers polled roughly 12,000 respondents in 11 countries, asking them how they felt about autonomous vehicles. Similar questions were posed of participants in study groups held throughout Europe.

The data is in line with that derived from other studies, which have shown that motorists are very concerned about self-driving vehicles. Those surveyed admitted that human error is to blame for most auto accidents, and that, in theory, autonomous cars would be safer. However, nearly three-quarters of respondents--73 percent, to be exact--were afraid that self-driving software could malfunction, leading to Terminator/I Robot/2001-style catastrophes. 

Just as interesting is the fact that 60 percent of those surveyed worried that "Machines don’t have the common sense needed to interact with human drivers." They'll stop at every yellow light and they'll wait their turn at every intersection--which, in case you haven't noticed, isn't the way that most of us drive.

At least some respondents suggested that they'd find autonomous cars so frustratingly lawful that they might bully them in traffic. As one UK participant explained: "[The autonomous vehicles are] going to stop. So you’re going to mug them right off. They’re going to stop and you’re just going to nip round."

In the end, researchers found that respondents viewed autonomous vehicles more favorably the longer they thought about them. However, it'll take more than reflection and statistics to put drivers at ease. As the study organizers explain:

"Arguments that focus simply on promoting greater safety, lifestyle enhancements or economic efficiencies will not gain traction if [autonomous vehicles] do not fit comfortably into the public’s picture of what the road should be like for them to drive on."

Does this mean that programmers should design autonomous cars to drive like jerks? (Please, no.) Or should we modify our own driving behavior to be more lawful and patient? (Not very likely.)

This story originally appeared on The Car Connection.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Human drivers will probably bully self-driving cars
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today