2017 Chevrolet Volt rated 'Top Safety Pick+' by IIHS

The 2017 Chevrolet Volt has passed the now-stricter IIHS tests with flying colors.

Tony Ding/AP/File
The 2016 Chevrolet Volt hybrid car is presented at the North American International Auto Show, in Detroit.

Over the past few years, the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety has made its ratings process more challenging for automakers. However, the 2017 Chevrolet Volt has passed its IIHS tests with flying colors, nabbing the highly coveted rank of "Top Safety Pick+".

To earn that, the 2017 Volt had to perform well on the organization's traditional side, moderate overlap front, roof strength, and head restraint tests, as well as new tests for small overlap front and front crash prevention. It also had to have headlights rated as good or acceptable.

On the IIHS' side, moderate overlap front, roof strength, and head restraint tests, the Volt earned solid "good" ratings. It also earned a "good" on the more challenging small overlap front test--an improvement from the previous generation Volt, which earned an "acceptable" rating. (You can see the 2017 Volt taking the small overlap front test in the video clip above.) 

The Chevy Volt also has front crash prevention (including two automated braking systems), making it possible for the car to earn the IIHS' "+" rating. On front crash prevention tests, the IIHS says that the Volt completely avoided a collision at 12 mph, and its speed at impact was cut by 5 mph in the organization's 25 mph test. All in all, the Volt earned a superior rating on front crash prevention. 

As for headlights, the Volt's standard lights earned an "acceptable" rating from the IIHS. With the optional high beam assist--which detects the presence of other vehicles and switches from high to low beams automatically--the Volt's headlight rating rose to "good".

The Volt is a plug-in hybrid vehicle that can travel 53 miles on a single charge before its gasoline system kicks in. It's the first in a series of electric and plug-in hybrids that were recently tested by the IIHS. Others scores will be published soon. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.