You know cars, trucks, and motorcycles, but what's an autocycle?

Motorcycles have two wheels, while passenger cars and light trucks have four. Elio Motors wants to add another category with its three-wheeled car.

Elio Motors
Paul Elio, founder and CEO of Elio Motors, with the P5 prototype of the Elio, a three-wheeled vehicle that will get up to 84 MPG with a targeted base price of $6,800. The company today announced it has established a Pilot Operations Center in Livonia, Mich., for the purpose of assembling its E-Series vehicles, which will be used to conduct safety, system-performance, manufacturability and durability tests prior to commercial production of the vehicle.

To say three-wheeled vehicles are rare in the North American car market would be an understatement.

Traditionally, motorcycles have two wheels, and passenger cars and light trucks have four.

But Elio Motors wants to change that with its three-wheeled car, which it says will be offered for $6,800 and achieve 84 mpg on the highway.

The challenge is that cars with three wheels fall into a grey area in most states, since Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards apply only to those with four wheels.

As a result, drivers of three-wheeled vehicles are considered to be riding motorcycles in many states, and hence could be required to wear helmets in some of them.

Which is appropriate for motorcycles, but less so for enclosed passengers cars.

Moreover, some states may not only view three-wheeled cars as motorcycles but also require a motorcycle license to pilot them. That's a huge sales disincentive, to say the least.

Which is where the concept of an "autocycle" comes in. Quietly, with little notice, Elio Motors has been working on three separate legislative tacks.

The first is to get an enclosed three-wheeled vehicle adopted as a separate vehicle category; the second is to eliminate helmet laws for occupants; and the third is to ensure that a motorcycle license isn't required to operate one.

In the absence of a U.S. federal law that would supersede individual state regulations, Elio has been working state by state to eliminate such laws.

It has largely succeeded on the helmet front, according to Elio's Joel Sheltrown

While helmets were required to pilot an Elio in seven states when the company launched, now they're required only in West Virginia (and for drivers under a certain age in five other states).

As for motorcycle licenses, 41 of 50 states do not now require a motorcycle license to operate a three-wheeled car like the Elio.

Those that do, Sheltrown said, tend to have fewer people in them, including Hawaii, South Dakota, and Wyoming, so offer less market opportunity for the company.

New York is the only remaining state with a large population in which operating an Elio "technically" requires a motorcycle license, and two bills are in process to address that.

Because the New York State Legislature will not reconvene until January, no action can be taken on those bills until next year.

Sheltrown provided national maps showing state-by-state requirements for helmets and motorcycle licenses, and the status of a separate autocycle definition for each state.

At the national level, U.S. senator David Vitter [R-LA] introduced the Autocycle Safety Act in March 2015.

That bill would create a new classification of "autocycle" for an enclosed motor vehicle with three wheels—and eliminate state laws that treated such vehicles as motorcycles.

That legislation would require autocycles to include airbag protection for occupants, three-point safety restraints, and anti-lock brakes. It would also subject them to Corporate Average Fuel Economy Standards.

The Vitter bill has not been passed by the U.S. Senate thus far.

And it is not at all clear that the NHTSA would like such a definition, since it may be moving in a different direction altogether.

Canada already has its own definition of a Three-Wheeled Vehicle category, which requires appropriate safety standards, eliminating any helmet or motorcycle license requirements.

This story originally appeared on GreenCarReports.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.