Tesla Model X falcon door update may have made them worse

The double-hinged, falcon-wing doors on the Tesla Model X may look super cool and futuristic, but they've caused headaches for owners since day one (and for Tesla, far longer). 

Stephen Lam/Reuters/File
A Tesla Motors Model X electric sports-utility vehicle opens its falcon wing doors on stage during a presentation in Fremont, Calif.

The double-hinged, falcon-wing doors on the Tesla Model X may look super cool and futuristic, but they've caused headaches for owners since day one (and for Tesla, far longer). To improve them, Tesla recently published an over-the-air software update, but that may have made things worse.

Problems with the doors became evident even before Tesla began delivering the Model X to buyers. The supplier that Tesla had contracted to build the doors couldn't do so in the way that Tesla wanted, so Tesla cancelled the contract and sued the supplier. In the end, Tesla had to develop the doors itself, which helped delay the arrival of the Model X by nearly two years.   

Consumer complaints about the doors began rolling in almost as soon as the Model X rolled out. One of the most common gripes has been that the doors' showstopping opening and closing routine makes them impractical. Unlike most doors that can be opened and closed manually, the falcon-wing doors work by pressing a button. So, if you're in a hurry and need to toss something in the backseat, you have to wait for the doors to open and then close. To this day that remains a problem.

Less common but just as important have been complaints that the doors open and shut on their own, without warning. Some owners also say that the doors are prone to false detection of obstacles, preventing them from closing smoothly.

To address those issues, Tesla published a software update this week--an update that's been expected for months. Unfortunately, it appears that the update disabled some important sensors that could prevent the doors from injuring passengers. 

As you can see from the video above, one Model X owner notes that the "pinch sensors" in the rubber moulding around the door weren't affected by the update--and that's good. However, the sensors embedded on the interior face of the door have been disabled, and those sensors detect obstacles that the pinch sensors might not.

For a demonstration, fast forward to 8:50 in the video. You'll see that the owner puts a cucumber in the door's path as it's closing. It's easily cut in half.

In sum, the good news is, the sensors on the face of the falcon-wing doors will no longer falsely detect obstacles in a door's path. The bad news is, the sensors won't detect any obstacles, real or imaginary.

Tesla CEO Elon Musk has admitted that including the falcon-wing doors was probably a mistake--something he might've foreseen based on the many problems associated with their cousins, gull-wing doors. It's too late to turn back now, so the question becomes: can software ever truly fix them?

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Tesla Model X falcon door update may have made them worse
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today