Californians bought more electric cars in June than rest of US combined

California, with its pioneering zero-emission vehicle sales requirements, has always occupied an outsize place in the sales charts.

Kai Pfaffenbach/Reuters/File
A battery charger sign for electric cars is painted on the ground at a parking lot in Wolfsburg, Germany.

Sales of plug-in electric cars are not evenly distributed across the US by any means.

California, with its pioneering zero-emission vehicle sales requirements, has always occupied an outsize place in the sales charts.

Not only is it the most populous state in the union, with 39 million residents, but it accounts for a large share of all electric and plug-in hybrid vehicle sales.

Just how large is shown in a California Plug-In Electric Vehicle Collaborative graphic, which highlights the state's share of June plug-in sales.

Of the 13,772 cars with plugs sold last month, 7,161 went to buyers in California.

That's exactly 52 percent, or more than the entire rest of the U.S. combined.

Of the 467,000 electric cars sold since December 2010, Californians accounted for 216,000 of them—or 46 percent.

Sales of cars with plugs stayed at about the same level—slightly more than 100,000 units a year—over the last two years.

Buyer preferences for SUVs and crossover utility vehicles, which are a minority of the high-volume plug-in vehicles available, have combined with cheap gasoline to keep sales lower than many advocates expected after fast growth in 2012 and 2013.

It's notable that in the first six months of this year, BMW sold almost as many of its X5 xDrive 40e plug-in hybrid SUV—2,577—as it did of its pioneering i3 battery-electric car (2,880).

That's despite the plug-in hybrid X5 having an electric range of just 14 miles against the i3's 81 miles (soon to rise to 114 with a new battery pack for 2017).

Plug-in hybrid SUVs are also offered by Mercedes-Benz and Volvo, with the latter's XC90 T8 version doing well too.

And automakers are aware that they must continue selling cars with plugs, however grudgingly.

They know they must both meet the California ZEV mandate—which until 2018 applies only to Fiat Chrysler, Ford, GM, Honda, Nissan, and Toyota—and gain experience for future years in which radically lower emissions will be demanded by regulators worldwide.

California provides the most fertile market for those vehicles, and the "travel provision" quirk in its ZEV regulations allows a car sold in that state to fulfill ZEV-sales requirements in 10 other states as well.

Automakers will have to start selling zero-emission vehicles in each of those states to meet the rules starting in 2018.

A move is now afoot among makers and their lobbyists to continue the travel provision indefinitely, meaning sales would continue to be largely centered in California.

We'll have more about that in a future story.

[hat tip: Brian Henderson]

This story originally appeared on GreenCarReports.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.