VW supports biofuels as an alternative, even as it introduces more electric cars

Are there many different ways to reduce the carbon associated with road vehicles? Or are electric vehicles the best and only viable way to proceed? That's the debate at the heart of two different reports on Volkswagen's recent actions in Europe last week.

|
Jim Young/Reuters/File
A gas pump displays the price for E15, a gasoline with 15 percent of ethanol, and various other ethanol blends at a gas station in Nevada, Iowa (May 17, 2015). VW is expanding its electric car lineup and looking into more options for biofuels.

Are there many different ways to reduce the carbon associated with road vehicles?

Or are electric vehicles the best and only viable way to proceed?

That's the debate at the heart of two different reports on Volkswagen's recent actions in Europe last week.

At the company's annual meeting earlier last week, VW Group CEO Matthias Müller reiterated the company's plans to "make electric cars one of Volkswagen's new hallmarks."

The company will have 20 new models that plug in by 2020, he said, according to a report in The Telegraph, a British newspaper.

Its most immediate priority, he said, is to recall and modify all the diesel cars that were rigged to cheat on emission testing both in the EU and North America.

The company will apparently be required to offer to buy back all 482,000 of its 2.0-liter TDI diesel vehicles sold in the U.S. since 2009, but the final terms of a settlement with the EPA won't be released until June 24.

Indeed, virtually every VW press release over the last few months has focused either on the company's efforts to address the expanding diesel scandal or touting its future lineups of electric and plug-in hybrid models and concepts.

But at the same time, the company is participating in the Auto Fuels Coalition, which urges much greater use of biofuels to reduce net carbon emissions from transport within Europe.

A study commissioned by the coalition—which includes Shell Oil as a member—and conducted by consultant Roland Berger uses highly pessimistic assumptions about the rates of electric-car adoption in Europe.

Its proposals include expanded use of biofuels, clear labeling of every vehicle's carbon-dioxide emissions, and greater use of the EU's carbon-emission trading system.

Ulrich Eichhorn, newly named head of research and development efforts at VW Group, said that plug-in vehicles were "building blocks" toward future low- and zero-emission transport, but that expanded biofuel use would also be required to meet aggressive EU carbon-reduction goals for 2025 and 2030.

An article in The Guardian, another British newspaper, suggests that the biofuel proposals would lead to "the end of meaningful new regulatory action on car emissions for more than a decade."

That statement and others in the same vein, however, are attributed only to "an EU source" by the newspaper.

The Roland Berger study includes assumptions that little public demand for plug-in cars will develop until renewable energy prices fall from their current levels and the EU has 5 million individual charging points for electric cars.

The debate comes down to an "all of the above" theory versus a focus on one single technology.

As in many such debates over future technologies to address global concerns, valid points exist on both sides.

Volkswagen, however, may find that no matter which way it positions itself, its actions over the last decade will make it the whipping boy for all sides.

What's that saying about karma again?

This article first appeared at GreenCarReports.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to VW supports biofuels as an alternative, even as it introduces more electric cars
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Business/In-Gear/2016/0502/VW-supports-biofuels-as-an-alternative-even-as-it-introduces-more-electric-cars
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe