Is lower fuel economy to blame for the halt on European VW diesel update?

Six months on, an update for affected VW diesel cars in Europe is still in the works.

Hannah McKay/Reuters/File
Emissions testing takes place on a vehicle at 'Emissions Analytics' in west London, Britain (March 11, 2016). The company is an independent commercial test house using Portable Emissions Measurement Systems (PEMS) to measure real-world fuel economy and on-road emissions. Six months on, an update for affected VW diesel cars in Europe is still in the works.

Six months into the Volkswagen diesel scandal, the company still hasn't reached an agreement with regulators on how it will recall nearly 600,000 affected TDI cars in the U.S.

But things didn't look so bad in Europe, at least for a while.

VW previously said that a fix for some of the affected vehicles sold there had been approved, and that it would begin a recall in January.

But in Volkswagen's home market of Germany, that recall is being delayed because the planned fix results in higher fuel consumption, according to Automotive News Europe (subscription required).

VW began recalling Amarok pickup-truck models equipped with 2.0-liter four-cylinder TDI engines in January.

It was supposed to be the first stage of recall for 8.5 million affected Volkswagen, Audi, Skoda, and Seat models in Europe.

Now, a second phase involving 160,000 Passat mid-size sedans has reportedly been halted.

A VW spokesman confirmed the delay to Automotive News Europe, but denied that it was because of fuel-economy issues.

It's been assumed since the beginning that lower fuel economy could result from any fix that successfully lowers emissions.

Rather, the VW spokesman said, Germany's Federal Motor Transport Authority (KBA) is conducting additional checks.

Those checks were scheduled to have been completed by Easter, but likely won't be finished until this week or the next, the spokesman said.

A decision by the KBA to replace Volkswagen technicians with independent ones partway through the process also contributed to the delay, he added.

There are 2.5 million cars in Germany with "defeat device" software that need to be recalled, equipped with 2.0-liter, 1.6-liter, and 1.2-liter TDI engines.

The 2.0-liter and 1.2-liter cars will get software updates only, while 1.6-liter cars will require a software update and the installation of a piece of mesh to regulate airflow.

If VW can get things back on track, the next German recall will involve the Passat mid-size sedans, followed by 90,000 Audi A4 and A5, and Skoda Superb models.

The affected Seat models will be dealt with in a separate recall.

Following KBA approval of the modifications in Germany, Volkswagen will begin recalls in other European Union states.

Meanwhile, VW has until April 21 to come up with a recall plan for U.S. TDI vehicles.

The company and regulators already missed a March 24 deadline set by a U.S. District Court judge, after months went by with little apparent progress.

A proposal for Volkswagen and Audi models with 2.0-liter four-cylinder engines was previously rejected by the California Air Resources Board and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, because it lacked detail on the effects of the modifications on performance and fuel efficiency.

A second proposal for VW, Audi, and Porsche vehicles equipped with 3.0-liter V-6 engines was submitted earlier this year, but hasn't been approved by regulators.

This article first appeared in GreenCarReports.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.