Where Volkswagen fights its US diesel-cheating lawsuits matters. A lot.

Volkswagen would like to combine its legal proceedings related to cheating on diesel emissions tests in the US and try them in Detroit, but consumer advocates and officials are pushing for legal proceedings in other states. 

Kim Hong-Ji/Reuters/File
A logo of Volkswagen is illuminated at a dealership in Seoul.

After admitting to installing "defeat device" software in diesel cars to cheat emissions tests, Volkswagen will go a through a long--and expensive--process to rectify things.

In addition to paying to fix the affected diesel cars, it will likely face criminal penalties from regulatory bodies in multiple countries.

It will also have to deal with civil suits from disgruntled owners.

And where it faces those suits could have a big impact on the outcome.

This week, Volkswagen said it wanted to consolidate the more than 300 customer lawsuits pending against it, and face them in Detroit courts.

While it may be home to the Big Three U.S. automakers, Detroit holds some advantages for VW.

One is that people in the Detroit area already tend to sympathize with carmakers, which obviously has a large presence there.

Volkswagen itself isn't actually alien to Detroit; it has an engineering center in nearby Auburn Hills.

In addition, Volkswagen has asked to argue its cases before Chief U.S. District Judge Gerald E. Rosen.

Rosen--who was a key player in Detroit's recent restructuring--is considered fair and willing to look at issues from a variety of perspectives.

If he hears the cases, he's expected to not excessively fine VW.

Last month, Rosen tapped retired U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Steven Rhodes--another figure from Detroit's recent bankruptcy--and former U.S. District Judge Layn Phillips of Oklahoma to act as negotiators in the VW case, according to the Detroit Free Press.

There are currently some 350 lawsuits pending in 40 states. Volkswagen would like to streamline them by giving them class-action status.

Many of the suits have been filed by owners of the 482,000 diesel cars equipped with the 2.0-liter EA189 engine.

But there are also some suits from owners of the 85,000 vehicles with the larger 3.0-liter V-6 engine.

Five lawsuits have also been filed by investors, which claim to have lost large sums of money due to the scandal. It's unclear whether those cases will be included in a class-action suit.

And while Volkswagen hopes Detroit will be chosen as the venue, many lawyers would prefer to have cases heard in California.

Judges and juries there are expected to hand down harsher penalties.

Volkswagen opposes hearing cases in California, but is also advocating for a Federal court in Alexandria, Virginia, according to Bloomberg (via Autoblog).

The court is located near VW's U.S. headquarters in Herndon, as well as the headquarters of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

A panel of seven judges will meet December 3 in New Orleans to decide whether to combine the cases, and where they will be heard.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Where Volkswagen fights its US diesel-cheating lawsuits matters. A lot.
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today