Google hires former Hyundai, TrueCar exec to steer self-driving car project

Google's self-driving car project now has its own CEO in John Krafcik, an auto industry veteran who has worked for Hyundai, Ford Motor Company, and TrueCar. 

Tony Ding/AP/File
John Krafcik talks at the North American International Auto Show, in Detroit. Google says former Hyundai and Ford Motor Co. executive Krafcik will become CEO of its program focused on developing self-driving cars in late September 2015. Krafcik most recently served as an executive at TrueCar, which provides market-based pricing information on new and used cars.

Google’s autonomous car project now has its own CEO in the form of auto industry veteran John Krafcik. The 53-year-old has previously worked for the Ford Motor Company [NYSE:F] as well as Hyundai where he ran operations in the United States from 2008 to 2013. Most recently he was working for automotive pricing and information hub TrueCar.

Krafcik starts his new role later this month and will be based at Google’s headquarters in Mountain View, California. Previously, Chris Urmson, a former Carnegie Mellon University robotics researcher, was in charge of the autonomous car project. Urmson is expected to continue leading technical development while Krafcik, with his extensive industry knowledge and contacts, will likely spearhead the commercial aspects.

Google launched its autonomous car project in 2009 and still groups the project under the Google X banner. Google X is a semi-secret division at the tech giant which aims to develop new technologies.

Google’s goal is to develop a fully autonomous car, and already the company has a handful of prototypes being tested on public roads in California and Texas. What isn’t clear is whether Google plans to eventually build and sell autonomous cars, use the cars for an Uber-like taxi service or license the technology to established automakers. It's also entirely possible that all three scenarios are being looked at.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.