How Ford's smarter headlights will make nighttime driving easier

Ford's Camera-Based Advanced Front Lighting System will harness an infrared camera, GPS signals and special traffic sign recognition technology to make navigating dark roads easier. 

Seth Perlman/AP/File
The Ford logo on a vehicle at a Ford dealership in Springfield, Ill.

In the late '40s, the Tucker Torpedo featured a third headlight dubbed the Cyclops Eye.

The centrally mounted unit was connected to the steering rack, and thus could pivot its beam around corners. It was just one of the many innovative safety features found on Preston Tucker's doomed machine. And while illumination has come a long way in the decades since, by modern standards, headlights are still relatively dumb appliances.

But that's changing. And the Ford Motor Company [NYSE:F] is just one of the groups developing technology to bring automotive lighting into the 21st century.

The future, as they say, looks bright.

Ford's Camera-Based Advanced Front Lighting System will harness an infrared camera, GPS signals and special traffic sign recognition technology to make navigating dark roads easier. Along with alerting drivers to pedestrians, cyclists, and animals in the vehicle path, the system will be able to "remember" previously traveled roads and adjust lights to better allow drivers to see bends and potential hazards. At this point, eight risks can be tracked at one time, and the system will even prioritize the top two threats. 

Audi currently offers some of that functionality via its Matrix LED system, though due to a technicalities in domestic laws, it's not available stateside yet. General Motors Company [NYSE:GM], via its European unit Opel, is also working on headlights that can track your eye movements.

Of course, regulation that impedes new lighting technology isn't exactly new. Upon the debut of the Tucker Torpedo, its third headlight was illegal in almost 20 states. But when it comes time to offer the Camera-Based Advanced Front Lighting System on its vehicles, something tells us Ford will fare better than Preston Tucker did in getting the laws changed.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.