Mysterious Tesla Model S 'D' photo appears after Musk tweet. What could it be?

A  photo surfaced that purports to show a Tesla Model S  'P85D,' fueling the already-hot speculation over what Tesla and CEO Elon Musk will announce next week.  

Chattanooga Times Free Press/AP/File
Charles 'Chip' Monk recharges his Tesla Model S electric car at the Chattanooga Metropolitan Airport in Chattanooga, Tenn. A photo leak of a Model S plugged in to charge, at an unnamed airport with no license plate has sent speculation over what the company will be unveiling next week into overdrive.

The Internets exploded yesterday following a photo tweeted by Tesla Motors CEO Elon Musk, with the caption, "About time to unveil the D and something else".

Feverish speculation over what it meant took up terabytes of server space.

Then, yesterday afternoon, a photo surfaced that purports to show a Tesla Model S "P85D".

Hmmmmmmmm.

The photo in question was posted to the Tesla Motor Club by forum member Adelman, in a thread discussing Musk's mysterious tweet.

It's a remarkably high-resolution image of the rear of a Tesla Model S, plugged in to charge, at an unnamed airport. The car has no license plate.

Whether the photo is happenstance or a convenient "leak" remains unknown, but the net effect was to stoke the flames of discussion further.

Forty-two pages of forum discussion seem to have settled down to a consensus that "D" will be the designation for "Dual" motors--which is to say the all-wheel-drive option long expected as a new Model S option.

Such a car would be a spinoff from Tesla's AWD work on the upcoming Model X crossover utility vehicle, which will be offered only with all-wheel drive.

A number of commenters--among them Green Car Reports' own Chris O--suggested that perhaps the AWD model might be called "DD," for Dual Drive.

Which would, as Chris suggests, explain why Musk didn't particularly want to tweet that it was time to unveil the DDs.

Ahem.

We'll find out late next Thursday, October 9, the date of Tesla's scheduled press and owner event.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.