U.S. now produces more oil than it imports: Good or bad?

For the first time in two decade, the U.S. is now producing more oil than it imports. This means pricing stability and greater economic growth but some skeptics argue that the increase in U.S. oil production is a sign that we're using too much oil in the first place. 

David McNew/Reuters/File
Oil rig pumpjacks, also known as thirsty birds, operate near Long Beach, California. The U.S. now produces more oil than it imports.

It's official: The U.S. now produces more oil than it imports from foreign countries.

It isn't the first time that's ever happened, but it's the first time in two decades--and according to the White House, it's going hand-in-hand with lower CO2 emissions and growing GDP.

For those advocating greater energy independence, it's undoubtedly a good sign.

For too long, the U.S. has been at the behest of countries with dubious political processes. Importing oil from some regions--particularly those in the Middle East--has led to shortages, fluctuating prices and even war. Reducing those imports can only be a good thing. 

It leads to pricing stability and greater economic growth--and keeps money generated in the U.S, inside the U.S. A study last year concluded that the U.S. could be the world's biggest oil producer by 2020. And completely energy-independent by 2030.

It's concurrent, if not directly related, to improving fuel efficiency in U.S. vehicles, greater use of biofuels and a reduction in greenhouse gases. Other studies have shown that the U.S. uses less oil now than it did just under a decade ago, when fuel use first started dropping. We may be in an energy-consuming society, but we're still using less of it.

But is the rate at which the U.S. is producing oil still a good thing? For some, it's still a sign we're using too much oil in the first place. And ultimately, the fuel we use still relies heavily on imports, even if they're at a 17-year low.

Others may see it as prolonging the wait before we have a true drop in oil usage and CO2 emissions, and extending the environmental impact of fossil fuels. Sure, it's great not importing so much oil from war-torn areas, but we should avoid producing too much as well. The less oil, the better, right?

We'd like to know what our readers think.

Do the economic benefits of greater domestic production and reduced net imports partly offset the downsides of continued oil use? Or should our goal be to minimize production and imports and move towards greener sources of energy sooner?

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.