U.S. now produces more oil than it imports: Good or bad?

For the first time in two decade, the U.S. is now producing more oil than it imports. This means pricing stability and greater economic growth but some skeptics argue that the increase in U.S. oil production is a sign that we're using too much oil in the first place. 

  • close
    Oil rig pumpjacks, also known as thirsty birds, operate near Long Beach, California. The U.S. now produces more oil than it imports.
    David McNew/Reuters/File
    View Caption
  • About video ads
    View Caption

It's official: The U.S. now produces more oil than it imports from foreign countries.

It isn't the first time that's ever happened, but it's the first time in two decades--and according to the White House, it's going hand-in-hand with lower CO2 emissions and growing GDP.

For those advocating greater energy independence, it's undoubtedly a good sign.

Recommended: US energy in five maps (infographics)

For too long, the U.S. has been at the behest of countries with dubious political processes. Importing oil from some regions--particularly those in the Middle East--has led to shortages, fluctuating prices and even war. Reducing those imports can only be a good thing. 

It leads to pricing stability and greater economic growth--and keeps money generated in the U.S, inside the U.S. A study last year concluded that the U.S. could be the world's biggest oil producer by 2020. And completely energy-independent by 2030.

It's concurrent, if not directly related, to improving fuel efficiency in U.S. vehicles, greater use of biofuels and a reduction in greenhouse gases. Other studies have shown that the U.S. uses less oil now than it did just under a decade ago, when fuel use first started dropping. We may be in an energy-consuming society, but we're still using less of it.

But is the rate at which the U.S. is producing oil still a good thing? For some, it's still a sign we're using too much oil in the first place. And ultimately, the fuel we use still relies heavily on imports, even if they're at a 17-year low.

Others may see it as prolonging the wait before we have a true drop in oil usage and CO2 emissions, and extending the environmental impact of fossil fuels. Sure, it's great not importing so much oil from war-torn areas, but we should avoid producing too much as well. The less oil, the better, right?

We'd like to know what our readers think.

Do the economic benefits of greater domestic production and reduced net imports partly offset the downsides of continued oil use? Or should our goal be to minimize production and imports and move towards greener sources of energy sooner?

The Christian Science Monitor has assembled a diverse group of the best auto bloggers out there. Our guest bloggers are not employed or directed by the Monitor and the views expressed are the bloggers' own, as is responsibility for the content of their blogs. To contact us about a blogger, click here. To add or view a comment on a guest blog, please go to the blogger's own site by clicking on the link in the blog description box above.


We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.