Tesla crash test: Tesla Model S is the safest car in the history of the NHTSA

Tesla crash test: The Tesla Model S was given the highest-ever safety score by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, meaning the electric car is not only eco-friendly but also sturdy in a crash. The Tesla Model S scored top marks in all safety categories. 

Paul Sakuma/AP/File
Tesla CEO Elon Musk waves during a rally at the Tesla factory in Fremont, Calif. in 2012. The Tesla Model S earned the highest safety rating the NHTSA has ever awarded, according to Ingram.

The Tesla Model S is no stranger to awards and high scores, but its latest accolade could be its most important yet.

Its five-star National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) crash test rating was revealed a few weeks back, but Tesla Motors (NSDQ:TSLA) has now revealed the car's score is the highest ever recorded by the NHTSA.

While its five-star score across the board has been attained by other vehicles – around one percent of all cars tested are capable of such a score – its ratings in individual categories are higher than any other vehicle, including larger SUVs and minivans.

As we've seen with other vehicles over recent weeks, the NHTSA tests cars in a frontal impact, side impact, side pole impact and a rollover risk test, which record's the vehicle's likelihood of rollover when performing an avoidance maneuver.

It scored exceptionally in all categories. Frontal impact was aided by the lack of engine block under the Tesla's "frunk"--allowing more space for impact absorption.

Side impact was also rated very highly, while Tesla's use of multiple deep aluminum extrusions in the side rail of the car allowed a higher performance in the pole impact test than a similarly-rated car, the Volvo S60. Tesla explains on its blog that the Model S preserved 63.5 percent of driver residual space, compared to 7.8 percent in the Volvo.

The S scored well in rear impact too, even considering the two rear-facing occupant seats. Tesla revealed the factory installs a double rear bumper if the rear seats are specified--probably going some way to explaining the extra cost.

Rollover risk was rated at just 5.7 percent--"refusing to turn over via the normal methods and special means were needed to induce the car to roll"--a successful rating attributed to the Model S's low center of gravity. Tesla's own independent testing has shown the car's rollover strength to be incredibly high, too--breaking the test machine at 4g.

Tesla Motors also notes that during its own safety testing, the company deliberately ensured that the car was capable of withstanding impacts different to those conducted in official testing--making the car strong everywhere, rather than "gaming" official tests.

Just last week, WGNS Radio revealed that one driver has already conducted their own impromptu pole test in a Model S, surviving unscathed.

A 34-year old Tennessee woman was arrested and charged with DUI after crashing into a power pole, cutting off electricity to local residents. The near-5,000-lb Model S flattened the pole and sustained significant damage, but the cabin itself was unaffected.

The bottom line? Tesla hasn't just produced one of the best cars Consumer Reports has ever tested, but the safest car the NHTSA has ever tested too.

You can find the NHTSA's full test ratings for the Model S here.

[Hat tip: Brian Henderson]

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.