Tesla: Cash flow positive by November?

Tesla has faced its fair share of fiscal woes lately, but the electric car company's CEO says Tesla is far from short on cash

David McNew/Reuters/File
Tesla CEO and co-founder Elon Musk unveils the Tesla Motors Model X electric vehicle at the Tesla Design Studio in Hawthorne, California in this February 2012 file photo. Musk has said that Tesla will be cash flow positive by the end of November.

Just last week, Tesla revised its 2012 revenue projections downward from some $600 million to between $400 and $440 million, blaming production startup problems with the Model S sedan for the decline in revenue.

In the same filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), Tesla stated its desire to raise an additional $150 million through a follow-on share offering, leaving some to speculate the start-up automaker was running short of cash.

In a statement on the Tesla Motors website, Elon Musk addressed this speculation as an “incorrect interpretation” of the SEC filing. Saying that public companies need to make investors aware of every risk, no matter how slight, Musk explained his use of language as “discomforting at best.”

Further clarifying the company’s position, Musk went on to state that money raised was to be used exclusively for risk reduction. While Tesla can control production and even (to some degree) vendor supply issues, it’s can’t control the unforeseen, such as fires, floods and earthquakes.

Shrugging off the notion that Tesla was running out of cash, Musk went on to say that Tesla would be cash flow positive at the end of next month, November 2012. Furthermore, it’s making an advance payment on outstanding Department of Energy (DOE) loans, making its March 2013 payment this month.

Tesla has negotiated with the DOE to lower the amount of principal payments held in reserve from nine months to six months, and has assured the DOE of its intentions to pay back the loans earlier than required to do so.

While others may view Tesla as a failure, if Musk can deliver as promised we see nothing but growth in its future. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.