Taking your car complaint online? Chrysler, GM, and Ford will see it.

Trying to solve  a car problem online can lead you down a rabbit hole of obscure fan forums and discussion boards. Useless? Hardly. Car companies are seeing – and solving – common posted complaints.

Gary Cameron/Reuters/File
Chrysler 300 automobiles are seen on a new car lot in Silver Spring, Maryland earlier this month. Chrysler, Ford, and General Motors have begin monitoring online forums to better address consumer complaints.

So, you're driving along, minding your own business, when your car starts making a funny noise. Or there's a gap in the upholstery that you hadn't noticed before. Or your windows won't roll up properly. You get home, and like most tinkerers in this day and age, you fire up the interwebs and do a little Googling to find a fix for the annoying problem.

Nine times out of ten, you're led down a rabbit-hole lined with fan forums and discussion boards, chock-full of posts from fellow owners who've complained of similar issues. Given the obscurity of some of those forums, it might seem that no one would ever read such kvetching, but according to Detroit News, Detroit automakers are indeed patrolling the boards -- and they're jumping in to address problems when they can. 

They're listening

It's a variation on what's loosely called "reputation management", which has been made possible, in part, by improvements to the web's major search engines. With Google, for example, company reps can scan for terms like "Ford Mustang" or "Chevy Camaro" and winnow down the results to reveal those that have been posted on blogs within the past 24 hours.

Chrysler appears to be leading the charge on this front, thanks to the work of Pietro Gorlier, the president of Mopar brand service, parts, and customer service at Chrysler/Fiat. Before the two automakers merged in 2009, he was doing exactly this sort of "listening" work for Fiat, and now, he's applied what he learned to the entire Chrysler/Fiat family.

Gorlier began by restructuring Chrysler/Fiat to focus on its brands, not on its overarching corporate identity. This is very similar to what General Motors has been doing the past couple of years, with GM stepping out of the spotlight and putting Buick, Cadillac, Chevrolet, and GMC front-and-center. The rationale for both companies' moves is identical: most customers don't buy the corporation, they buy they brand

Part of Gorlier's strategy then involved creating brand teams to patrol key fan forums, scrolling through the seemingly endless threads. Gorlier's teams reach out to owners when they see a problem they might be able to fix, and they pass innovative ideas over to Chrysler/Fiat's research/development teams. In the past year alone, Gorlier's online staffers have posted over 3,000 messages to forums, which have generated contacts with nearly 500,000 individuals.

While Ford and GM don't seem to devote quite as much staff time to such activities, it's become part of their corporate game plan, too. Quite rightly, they focus their attention on models with loyal fan-bases, like the Ford F-150 pickup, since owners of those vehicles are most likely to take to the internet with their complaints and kudos.


What's interesting is that lawyers at Chrysler (and presumably at Ford and GM, too) initially objected to the idea of company reps trolling internet forums. Though the Detroit News story doesn't go into detail, we have a hunch that the lawyers' objections might've been tied to liability: offer a handy fix for a problem, and the company could get sued if the fix isn't quite as easy or effective as thought. 

Then, too, there's the issue of contacting customers through "unofficial" means. Corporations generally have very specific ways in which they like to discuss things with owners -- ways that can be monitored and recorded in real time, as anyone who's ever called a customer service line knows. Unfortunately, forums aren't on that list.

And of course, there's the potential PR problem that automakers might face by speaking to customers in a forum environment. Fans have often assumed that they could grouse about their vehicles without the manufacturer listening in. Does it seem Big Brothery, then, when a company rep speaks up on a forum?

Our take

Gorlier and his colleagues at Ford and GM are absolutely on the right path. Although there are undoubtedly vehicle problems that online reps haven't been able to fix, as long as those reps make an effort to speak to customers with dignity, respect, and attention to their individual concerns -- not via canned messages -- those customers are likely to feel an increased loyalty to their favorite brands. And given how competitive sales are nowadays, that kind of loyalty can make all the difference.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.