Amid sexual harassment scandal, Fox News now faces racial discrimination lawsuit

Fox News anchor Kelly Wright on Wednesday joined a racial discrimination lawsuit filed by 13 people against the company, which came as Fox tried to control the damage caused by the recent sexual harassment scandal that led to the firing of its star host Bill O'Reilly. 

Brendan McDermid/Reuters
Fox News host Kelly Wright speaks in front of fellow plaintiffs to address a race discrimination class-action lawsuit filed against Fox News on behalf of former and current Fox News employees, in New York City on Wednesday.

A Fox News Channel anchor who is black has joined a racial discrimination lawsuit against his company, saying Wednesday that the network marginalized him and has little interest in promoting diversity.

Kelly Wright, who primarily works an overnight shift at Fox, said at an emotional news conference that his efforts at promoting diversity at Fox have largely failed. He said former Fox host Bill O'Reilly rejected a piece Mr. Wright had prepared after racial protests in Ferguson, MO., because it showed blacks in "too positive" a light.

"This hurts," Wright said.

The lawsuit adds to troubles at Fox that had largely been focused on the treatment of women. Former Fox News Chairman Roger Ailes lost his job last summer and Mr. O'Reilly was fired last week after harassment charges surfaced. So far, there's little evidence that the problems have affected cable news' top-rated network with its audience. Fox said late Tuesday the latest lawsuit contained "copycat complaints" and denied its allegations, and didn't have any comment after Wright's news conference.

Wright said he was moved to speak after off-air colleagues complained publicly about racial hostility, primarily coming from a recently fired comptroller at the network, Judith Slater. She has denied any wrongdoing through a lawyer. Thirteen people – eight who still work at Fox – joined the lawsuit, which also expanded to include the behavior of others.

"I can no longer sit in silence, collect my paycheck and act like I didn't experience racial bias on my own level as an on-air personality," Wright said. He said he wasn't part of any left-wing effort to hurt Fox and that he admires and likes many of the people there, "but I don't like what they do."

He said he was the only black male anchor at Fox and that his career had stalled with promised opportunities never materializing.

"Somewhere along the line there's an inbred way of thinking that the audience we have attracted perhaps wants to watch only one color on the air," he said. "I think we can definitely do better."

A female anchor who is black, Harris Faulkner, has a prominent role on Fox's daytime show "Outnumbered."

The lawsuit alleges that Fox employees took their complaints about Ms. Slater in 2008 to Dianne Brandi, chief counsel at Fox, and were told that nothing would be done about her because Slater "knew too much" about the behavior of Mr. Ailes, O'Reilly and others. Fox has specifically denied the allegations against Ms. Brandi.

This charge led Douglas Wigdor, the plaintiff's lawyer, to suggest that it was time to clean house among management at Fox. Ailes' former top deputy, Bill Shine, is co-president of the network and Brandi still works there.

Catherine Foti, Slater's lawyer, criticized Mr. Wigdor for using inflammatory language dating back to the days of slavery in his complaint. Wigdor had compared Fox's workplace to a plantation.

"These frivolous charges are solely aimed at generating headlines, inflaming racial tensions and poisoning potential jury pools and judges," Ms. Foti said.

Wigdor said his law firm has heard from others at Fox even since the lawsuit was filed Tuesday in New York State Supreme Court in the Bronx, and suggested it will expand further. His clients are looking for financial compensation, he said.

"Our hope is that Fox will take a more conciliatory approach," he said, "although I doubt that."

Among the new charges:

—A Bangladeshi man, Musfiq Rahman, said he mistakenly wandered into Ailes' office in 2014, prompting the then-boss to build a wall to prevent other unauthorized entries. Mr. Rahman said he was no longer permitted on Ailes' floor without an escort.

—A former financial worker, Mark LeGrier, said Slater retaliated when he complained to Brandi about her by subjecting him to "humiliating and weekly vicious attacks" about his performance. He left after nine months, "on the verge of a nervous breakdown," the lawsuit said.

—After President Trump announced a halt in immigration from seven countries, Slater allegedly asked black employees "who is going to Africa?" because she intended to start looking for replacements. Trump's election prompted her to warn black employees that they would not be able to return to the country if they left, the lawsuit said.

—A financial employee who is black, Griselda Benson, alleged that when she returned from a surgery, Slater said that her "people" were high maintenance with their health and were driving up the company's health insurance premiums.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Amid sexual harassment scandal, Fox News now faces racial discrimination lawsuit
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today