How a VW merger with Fiat Chrysler would change the auto industry

At Volkswagen's annual conference, the company's chief executive, Matthias Mueller, said he is leaving the door open to a potential merger with Fiat Chrysler.

Fabian Bimmer/Reuters
German carmaker Volkswagen CEO Matthias Mueller addresses the company's annual news conference in Wolfsburg, Germany, on March 14, 2017.

Speaking with reporters on Tuesday, Volkswagen Chief Executive Matthias Mueller said he would not rule out holding talks with Fiat Chrysler about a potential merger.

The comment, which followed VW’s annual news results conference, represented a marked change from just last week. At that time, Mr. Mueller said his company was occupied enough with its business transformation amid efforts to recover from its emissions scandal, appearing to dismiss all possibility of a union between the massive automakers.

"We are not ready for talks about anything," Mueller told Reuters last week at the Geneva auto show. "I haven't seen Marchionne for months," he added, referring to the Fiat Chrysler head Sergio Marchionne.

Following the recent acquisition of General Motors’s Opel brand by Peugeot’s parent PSA Group, however, some speculate that Mueller may have had a change of heart, realizing that his company could be facing dramatically increased European competition.

While he did not say if his change in perspective had anything to do with PSA Group’s recent procurement, Mueller did tell reporters his company was “more open” to merger discussions.

“I am not ruling out a conversation,” he told reporters when asked about Fiat Chrysler, though he added that he hadn’t been in communication with the Fiat Chrysler head in months. “It would be helpful if Mr. Marchionne were to communicate his considerations to me and not just to you,” he said, according to Reuters.

For his part, Mr. Marchionne has been an advocate for consolidation within the auto industry for some time.

At Tuesday’s news conference, Volkswagen also discussed its 2016 operating profit, bolstered in part by strong sales from its high-end Porsche division.

VW's results released at the conference showed that, due to the company’s 2015 diesel admissions scandal, underlying operating profits for their primary VW brand fell 10 percent to 1.9 billion euros ($2 billion US), with the profit margin dropping to 1.8 percent from 2 percent in 2015, Reuters reported.

Yet in 2016 VW overtook Toyota as the world’s largest automaker, as strong sales in China helped offset the drop in profit margins within the United States.

While Volkswagen as a whole performed well in 2016, PSA’s recent purchase of Opel has the potential to put pressure on VW in its home European market, where it still holds the top spot.

Previously, Mueller had declared his belief that his company’s turnaround could in part be achieved by shifting its overall structure and scheme, instituting pay cuts for senior executives and appointing more women to top leadership positions, according to the Financial Times. Mueller has also announced Volkswagen’s ambitious objective of dominating global markets for electric and autonomous vehicles, stating that the company will launch 10 electric vehicles by the end of the year and will have 30 fully electric automobiles on the road by 2025. Volkswagen also recently announced plans to partner with India-based Tata Motors.

From a strategic point of view, a merger with Fiat Chrysler could offer advantages to VW. While VW has struggled to regain market share in the United States, Fiat Chrysler currently owns the profitable Jeep and Ram brands, although its flagship Chrysler, Fiat, and Dodge lines have not been performing as well.

As of yesterday, however, "there are no plans and have been no discussions" between the two companies, Volkswagen spokesperson Jeannine Ginivan told USA Today in an email. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.