The new Apple campus will have a 1,000-seat theater in honor of Steve Jobs

But the process of building the new headquarters shows that the company retains the exacting standards that characterized its founder.

Courtesy of Apple
This is an artist's rendering of the Steve Jobs Theater at Apple Park. Opening later this year, the entrance to the 1,000-seat auditorium is a 20-foot-tall glass cylinder, 165 feet in diameter, supporting a metallic carbon-fiber roof. The Steve Jobs Theater is situated atop a hill, one of the highest points within Apple Park, overlooking meadows and the main building.

In June 2011, Steve Jobs showed the Cupertino, California city council plans for a vast, sleek new Apple headquarters.

Almost five years later, as that campus approaches completion in April, Apple has announced that its 1,000-seat auditorium will be named for Jobs, who passed away in October of 2011.

“Steve’s vision for Apple stretched far beyond his time with us. He intended Apple Park to be the home of innovation for generations to come,” Apple CEO Tim Cook told the Associated Press on Thursday.

Apple’s announcement comes as the company tries to maintain its competitive edge without its visionary founder.

In many respects, it’s succeeding. When the iPhone reaches its 10th birthday this June, it will have sold at least 1.2 billion units. Analyst Horace Dediu expects total revenue from iOS products to reach $1 trillion sometime this year. When Jobs pitched Apple’s new headquarters in 2011, the company’s shares were trading in the $40 to $50 range. Today, they’re around $136.

Nonetheless, some see cause for concern. The company’s revenue fell for three straight quarters in 2016 before snapping back in the first quarter of this year.

Some observers think that it’s grown too dependent on iPhone sales. Last month, New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd asked Silicon Valley investor Peter Thiel to confirm or deny the statement, “The age of Apple is over.”

“Confirm,” he replied. “We know what a smartphone looks like and does. It’s not the fault of Tim Cook, but it’s not an area where there will be any more innovation.”

Time will tell whether Apple can still prosper under its current business model. But the process of building the new headquarters, designed by world-renowned London architectural firm Foster + Partners, shows that the company retains the exacting standards that characterized its founder. As The Christian Science Monitor reported last month:

This attention to detail that Apple demanded of its construction workers, managers, architects, and others offers a window into the compulsive habits of the company and its founder, Mr. Jobs, which has driven its success. From perfectly flat doorways with no thresholds to unseen pipes and wiring, Apple required flawlessness in every aspect of the project.

Standards like these delayed the opening date by two years and raised the total price tag to about $5 billion. And not everyone is pleased with the design. When it was first announced, Los Angeles Times architecture critic Christopher Hawthorne took issue with the 175-acre campus’s “sprawling form and dependence on the car.”

But the team that Jobs assembled seems pleased with the final result.

“Steve invested so much of his energy creating and supporting vital, creative environments,” Jony Ive, Apple’s chief design officer, said in a statement reported by Reuters. “We have approached the design, engineering and making of our new campus with the same enthusiasm and design principles that characterize our products."

This report contains material from Reuters.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.