Google workers rally against Trump's travel ban

Joined by Google co-founder Sergey Brin, hundreds of the company's employees rallied outside their headquarters to protest President Trump's immigration ban, echoing criticism levied by CEOs of some of the world's biggest companies.

Marcio Jose Sanchez/AP/File
Google's headquarters in Mountain View, Calif., in 2013.

Hundreds of Google employees gathered outside the company's Mountain View, Calif., headquarters Monday to protest President Trump's executive order temporarily banning immigrants from seven majority-Muslim countries, hours after nearly a thousand Google workers held a similar march and rally in San Francisco. 

The unofficial event, started by a Google employee, featured speakers including Google's co-founder Sergey Brin, an immigrant from Russia, and Google chief executive Sundar Pichai. The rally came less than a week after Eric Schmidt, the executive chairman of Google’s parent company Alphabet, told Google employees in a weekly meeting that the Trump administration was "going to do these evil things as they’ve done in the immigration area and perhaps some others." 

Google is one of several businesses to take a strong stand against the travel ban since it was signed Friday, in what observers are calling an unprecedented corporate reaction to the executive order. The heads of Apple, Ford, and Goldman Sachs have all been vocal in their opposition to the measure, while a number of companies including Starbucks, Airbnb, and others have announced measures to assist refugees or employees affected by the ban. 

"We're in uncharted territory," said Michael Gordon, chief executive of Group Gordon, a corporate and crisis public relations firm in New York, to the Los Angeles Times. "What we're starting to see is the polarization of our politics is now leading to partisanship in everything, even bland topics like transportation, shoes, and coffee." 

At the Google rally Monday, Mr. Brin urged employees not to frame the immigration debate as a matter of Democrat vs. Republican. 

"It's a debate about fundamental values, about thoughtful policy making and many of the other things that I think are apparently not universally adored, but I think the vast majority of the country and of our legislators and so forth support, and I think it's important to frame it that way and to be inclusive about it," Brin said. "Sometimes it might be difficult because I know we have many, many values here that are not necessarily universally shared but I think these are really special times and I think it's important to form friendships with many different people." 

Taking a public stance on a political issue could be a risky move for businesses, particularly under a president with a history of criticizing companies on Twitter. But when the issue negatively affects employees or customers, public relations experts say, a business has no choice but to speak out. An email from Mr. Pichai to staff suggested that the executive order impacted at least 187 Google employees, according to The Wall Street Journal. 

"No company has gone out of business putting their customers and employees first," Matt Friedman, co-founder of Tanner Friedman Strategic Communications in Farmington Hills, Michigan, told the Associated Press. 

This report contains material from the Associated Press. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.