Lyft cuts staff: Does it have a new business strategy?

The country’s second largest ride-hailing company Lyft just dismissed or reassigned 17 employees.

Paul Sancya/AP/File
A smartphone displays the Lyft app. The ride-hailing company dismissed or reassigned more than a dozen employees on Friday.

The country’s second largest ride-hailing company Lyft dismissed or reassigned 17 employees in its sales support and business operation.

Seeking to carve a niche in a market dominated by Uber, Lyft said it will continue providing a complement or replacement for public transit in some cities and expanding its scheduling program “concierge,” which allows businesses to pre-arrange travel for their customers.

“We are optimizing our team to better match what we need in the market,” David Baga, Lyft’s chief business officer, told Bloomberg.

The ride-hailing company has also seen some success. Last August, it successfully struck its first deal with the local government in Centennial, Colo., to offer rides subsidized by the city to a light rail station. Boston followed, as the city’s transit agency Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority partnered with Lyft to provide an on-demand transit alternative for riders with disabilities, The Christian Science Monitor reported in September.

“This is an area that has the potential to be a very significant part of Lyft’s work in the future,” Emily Castor, director of transportation policy at Lyft, told Bloomberg in August.

According to Baga, these business initiatives are growing, with a 50 percent increase in quarterly revenue from business-related projects over the past three periods.

“We’re making tremendous progress in the businesses that have the highest propensity to travel,” Baga told Bloomberg. “We’re continuing to grow and are one of the fastest-growing initiatives.”

The startup received a $500 million investment from General Motors last January, betting its future on developing a network of self-driving cars.

The news comes a day after a report, compiled from business travel expenses reported on software provider Certify, shows that Uber is winning over business travelers, accounting for 52 percent of the ground transport market. While doubling its share from 2015, Lyft claims a meager 4.2 percent.

Mr. Baga’s team, which includes sales, has been responsible for Lyft’s recent push for business travels. Despite its initial branding as a personal peer-to-peer car booking service, with slogan “Your friend with a car,” Lyft last year landed some major corporate clients such as Apple and Airbnb, who prefer to use Lyft for its business travels.

Despite Lyft’s hope to differentiate itself from Uber through branding itself as the friendlier service, experts say Lyft’s sales efforts seems scanty considering Uber’s advantages in the field. Uber says more than 50,000 companies use its Uber Enterprise service and expects the number to at least double by mid-year.

"This is the one market which I think is better aligned with Uber's positioning than Lyft in part because Uber has the broader range of options and a larger fraction of the high-end vehicles," Arun Sundararajan, a professor at New York University's Stern School of Business, told Bloomberg on Thursday.

But no matter which approach Lyft takes, it all seems to align with the firm’s goal set when it was founded.

“I wanted to absorb all the alternatives to car ownership,” John Zimmer, the startup’s founder and president, wrote in blog post in September. “My hope was to come up with a transportation solution that didn’t require everybody to own a car like L.A. does.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.