Existing home sales fall – all the way down to 1999 levels

US home resales fell 2.8 percent last month, with the supply of houses on the market dipping to levels last seen in 1999.

John Bazemore/AP/File
A home is seen for sale in Roswell, Ga.

A shortage of houses for sale caused prices to rise and sales to slide in December, putting a pause on the housing market’s recovery.

The Associated Press reported Tuesday that 1.65 million homes were listed for sale last month in the United States, the fewest since 1999. With this limited supply, the median sale price rose to $232,000, up 4 percent from December 2015. This combination of higher prices and fewer options drove away many potential homebuyers: The National Association of Realtors said that sales of existing homes fell 2.8 percent in December.

December’s numbers marked a weak finish to an overall strong year for the housing market, and analysts don’t see the dip in supply as reason for alarm. But it could indicate deeper problems in the market that will need to be solved before more Americans can buy their first homes.

"The dip in housing sales is more a sign of the lack of homes to be bought than the desire to buy homes," Joel Naroff, chief economist at Naroff Economic Advisors in Pennsylvania, told Reuters. "It is hard to sell homes that are not for sale."

For most of 2016, Americans showed a strong “desire to buy.” The year’s overall sales increased 3.8 percent from 2015, to 5.45 million units, according to Reuters. Those were the highest numbers since 2006, when the housing market peaked.

Some investors see the current housing shortage as a simple problem of supply and demand. The share price of D.R. Horton, the largest US homebuilder, rose 6.61 percent Tuesday on hopes that it would ramp up activity to increase inventory.

But to grow the housing market, D.R. Horton and its competitors will need to build houses that first-time homebuyers can afford. In recent years, the real-estate industry has been slow to expand to this group. After sales of pre-owned homes slipped in February 2016, the Monitor reported that, “the real reason for the current housing shortage isn’t a lack of new construction. Rather, it's the gap in prices between mid-level and premium homes that prevents starter homeowners from moving up and first-time buyers from moving in.”

Ten months later, many first-time buyers still weren’t biting. “First-time buyers accounted for 32 percent of transactions last month," Reuters reports, "well below the 40 percent share that economists and realtors say is needed for a robust housing market. They accounted for 32 percent of transactions in 2016.” Inventories of starter and trade-up homes were also lower in the fourth quarter of 2016 than at the start of the year.

Low mortgage rates could lure more first-time buyers into the market. But those rates have been creeping up recently, causing the typical monthly payment to rise by $75, the Associated Press reported. On Saturday, President Trump cancelled an Obama administration plan to cut mortgage insurance premiums on federally insured home loans, one that could have saved eligible borrowers an average of $500 per year.

While these developments likely played into December’s dip in sales, analysts don’t expect the housing market to go into another tailspin.

Admir Kolaj, an analyst at TD Bank, told the Associated Press, "Home buying is likely to face additional headwinds going forward, which include low inventory levels, rebounding prices and higher mortgage rates," but these challenges probably won’t "completely derail" the housing market.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.