Jobless claims fall to lowest levels in more than 40 years

Signals such as job growth point to a strong start for the economy in 2017, analysts say. 

Matt Rourke/ AP/ File
In this June 23, 2014, file photo, a recruiter, at left, takes the resume of an applicant during a job fair in Philadelphia.

Americans heard no shortage of grim economic predictions during the 2016 presidential campaign. But the latest report from the US Department of Labor tells a different story.

On Thursday, the Labor Department reported that 234,000 Americans sought jobless aid in the week ending January 14th. The average claims for the four-week period ending on the 14th – which economists view as a less volatile measure – was 246,750.

Jobless claims serve as an index for layoffs in the economy, and these numbers are the lowest of their kind in over 40 years. Better yet, economists expect hiring to stay strong in 2017.

"The economy is doing great, whichever way you look at it," Harm Bandholz, the chief U.S. economist at UniCredit Research, told Reuters. "The labor market is close to full employment and the housing market continues to heal. Trump is inheriting a strong economy."

In addition to the past four weeks' jobless claim numbers – the lowest since November 1973 – other key economic indicators are also strong. New home construction starts rose 4.9 percent last year. Employers added 156,000 nonfarm jobs in December, and 2016 ended on a 4.7 percent unemployment rate – the lowest in a decade, according to the Wall Street Journal.

It’s not all good news, however. The labor force participation rate, which tracks people over age 16 who are working or looking for work, was 62.7 percent in December, versus 66.4 percent in December 2006. 

"In part this has to do with a shift in the labor market that makes it much harder to earn a living wage without post-secondary education," The Christian Science Monitor's Lonnie Shekhtman wrote earlier this month. "Some economists worry that among those who are not returning to the workforce are Americans who don't have the skills and training for the jobs that employers say they are struggling to fill." 

Many political and economic observers see the discontent of those working-class voters, particularly those without college degrees, as a major factor in President-elect Donald Trump's victory. Workers in that demographic may feel left out of recent months' job growth, with hiring in manufacturing and mining lagging behind healthcare and other, higher-skilled sectors.

“If you’re in a bifurcated economy ... it’s not broadly growing across the board; it’s spotty,” economist Chris Christopher Jr. told the Monitor last month.

One of Trump’s signature proposals for reviving manufacturing – putting high tariffs on imported goods – makes many economists worried. “Such moves would spark fierce resistance from the business community as well as many in Congress...it could also trigger similar responses from trading partners, putting a further brake on international trade,” Ms. Shekhtman reported in late December.

But absent these developments, economists foresee continued growth in 2017. As reported by the Associated Press, Jim O’Sullivan, the chief U.S. economist at High Frequency Economics, believes that hiring is "more than strong enough to keep the unemployment rate trending down."

This report contains material from Reuters and the Associated Press.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.