Why did Ukraine just nationalize its largest bank?

Ukraine's government agreed Sunday to move PrivatBank into full state ownership, following concerns about its stability.

Efrem Lukatsky/AP
A customer uses a PrivatBank ATM in Kiev, Ukraine.

Ukraine is moving its largest bank into full state ownership, the cabinet decided Sunday.

The move to nationalize the now inaptly named PrivatBank is an attempt to protect the country's financial system following concerns about its stability. The decision, backed by Kiev's international donors, "saved both the bank and the banking system," said Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko in a statement Monday. PrivatBank had been hit hard by the conflict in eastern Ukraine and subsequent economic crash in 2014 and 2015.

"It is obvious that the only way to save the bank, and its customers' money, was to make it state property," President Poroshenko said. "The alternative would appear irresponsible because it would mean closing our eyes, hiding our heads in the sand and waiting for the bank to fail." 

The decision was made with the consent of PrivatBank's owners, the Associated Press reports, presumably referring to oligarchs Ihor Kolomoisky and Hennady Boholyubov, who controlled more than 90 percent of the bank. PrivatBank and its owners have not yet commented on the decision. Last week, the bank dismissed speculation about nationalization as an "informational attack" meant to destabilize Ukrainian politics. 

PrivatBank had a capital shortfall of about $5.65 billion because of risky lending practices, according to Reuters, and roughly 97 percent of its corporate loans had reportedly gone to companies linked to its shareholders. 

The decision to nationalize the bank, which the finance minister said would require a minimum of $4.5 billion from the budget, has the potential to unlock more aid from the International Monetary fund next year. It could also, however, threaten to cause further instability. 

Opposition lawmakers have criticized the move, with one calling it the "greatest robbery of Ukraine's state budget of the millennium." Radical Party leader Oleh Lyashko blamed the PrivatBank's problems on the central bank, saying, "Ukrainians have to pay from their pockets for these mistakes." 

Poroshenko has urged the bank's millions of customers to "stay calm," as he has reportedly submitted a draft amendment to parliament that would give additional protection to depositors. 

Much of the situation rests on the upcoming parliament vote on next year's budget, which, as agreed with Ukraine's international backers, must stick to a shortfall of three percent of economic output. 

"The adoption of the budget will be the indicator," political analyst Volodymyr Fesenko told Reuters. "If the budget is approved this week without problems it means the situation is under control of the president and government." 

This report contains material from the Associated Press and Reuters. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Why did Ukraine just nationalize its largest bank?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Business/2016/1219/Why-did-Ukraine-just-nationalize-its-largest-bank
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe