Uber vs. California DMV: legal showdown over self-driving cars

The California Department of Motor Vehicles has ordered Uber to shut down its new self-driving car service in San Francisco, saying the ride-hailing company did not obtain the proper permit. 

Eric Risberg/AP
An Uber driverless car waits in traffic during a test drive in San Francisco on Dec. 13, 2016.

Just hours after its launch, California regulators have ordered Uber to shut down its self-driving car service in San Francisco – or else.

The state Department of Motor Vehicles issued a letter to the ride-share company on Wednesday demanding that it stop picking up San Francisco passengers in its so-called self-driving cars, on the grounds that Uber had failed to obtain a special state permit for autonomous vehicles on public roads. But the ride-share company has dismissed the order, arguing that its cars do not meet the state's definition of an autonomous vehicle and therefore do not require a permit. 

The showdown exhibits the challenges that state and federal regulators face in regulating self-driving cars as a growing number of carmakers and tech companies continue to develop autonomous vehicles.

The California law requiring permits for autonomous vehicles, adopted in 2014, requires testers to obtain a permit if the vehicle is capable of driving itself "without the active physical control or monitoring of a natural person." Because their self-driving Volvo SUVs aren't yet advanced enough to drive without human assistance, Uber says, they shouldn't qualify under the law. 

There may also be a competitive advantage to operating without a permit, as companies with one must report all crashes and instances in which a person takes control during testing to the state as public information. 

But California regulators argue that the cars are, legally speaking, "autonomous vehicles." And, as DMV Chief Counsel Brian Soublet said in an interview with the Associated Press, the permit process gives the public confidence in the safety of self-driving vehicles.

"Don't start doing this stuff. Apply for the permit. Follow the rules," Mr. Soublet urged Uber. In a letter to the ride-hailing company, Soublet warned that the DMV "will initiate legal action" if Uber "does not confirm immediately that it will stop its launch and seek a testing permit." 

Anthony Levandowski, the leader of Uber's self-driving service, acknowledged the controversy in a blog post Wednesday, citing a "more fundamental point" to the dispute: "how and when companies should be able to engineer and operate self-driving technology." 

"[S]everal cities and states have recognized that complex rules and requirements could have the unintended consequence of slowing innovation," Mr. Levandowski wrote, naming Pittsburgh, Arizona, Nevada, and Florida as "leaders" in this respect. "Our hope is that California, our home state and a leader in much of the world’s dynamism, will take a similar view." 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Uber vs. California DMV: legal showdown over self-driving cars
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today