Feds levy $185 million fine on Wells Fargo, send message to entire industry

A federal consumer protection agency says that Wells Fargo employees opened more than 2 million deposit and credit card accounts that may not have been authorized. 

Ben Margot/AP/File
A man passes by a Wells Fargo bank office in Oakland, Calif., on July 14, 2014. Regulators announced Thursday that Wells Fargo is being fined $185 million for illegally opening millions of unauthorized accounts for their customers in order to meet aggressive sales goals.

Wells Fargo was fined $185 million by California and federal regulators on Thursday, for going too far in the pursuit of sales goals by cheating customers into costly financial products that they didn't request. 

It is the largest fine levied by the five-year-old Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) against a financial institution.

The CFPB said Thursday that employees at Wells Fargo, the largest US bank by market capitalization, opened more than two million deposit and credit-card accounts that may not have been authorized. They transferred money from customers’ accounts to these new ones without permission. They also issued and activated debit cards, and created PIN numbers, without telling customers. Some bank employees even created fake email addresses to sign up customers for online banking services, according to the agency.

"Wells Fargo built an incentive-compensation program that made it possible for its employees to pursue underhanded sales practices, and it appears that the bank did not monitor the program carefully," said CFPB Director Richard Cordray.

"Today's action should serve notice to the entire industry that financial incentive programs, if not monitored carefully, carry serious risks that can have serious legal consequences," he said.

The aggressive sales tactics were uncovered by The Los Angeles Times in 2013. Its investigation led the Los Angeles city attorney office to sue Wells Fargo.

The bank has fired 5,300 employees – roughly five percent of its entire workforce – over "inappropriate sales conduct," according to the company’s spokeswoman Mary Eshet. The firings happened over five years, starting in 2011.

"We regret and take responsibility for any instances where customers may have received a product that they did not request," Wells Fargo said in a statement. It also reported that it has refunded $2.6 million in fees from the accounts that were opened without authorization.

Even after the L.A. Times investigation, Wells Fargo had aggressive sales goals for its employees, CFPB found. It required them to sell as many products – such as savings accounts, credit cards, or loans – to each customer as possible. On average, each Wells Fargo customer has six products with the bank.

These aggressive money-making tactics appear to spill over into other parts of the bank’s business. Today’s fine comes just weeks after Wells Fargo agreed to pay a separate $4.1 million settlement on CFPB allegations that it charged illegal fees and misled student-loan borrowers.

The bank processed payments in a way that maximized fees for many consumers, said the CFPB. It also misled borrowers about repayment options in a way that could have led to an increase in the cost of their loans. Additionally, Wells Fargo failed to update inaccurate information passed along to credit-report companies, and charged illegal fees.

“Because of the breakdowns throughout Wells Fargo’s servicing process, thousands of student loan borrowers encountered problems with their loans or received misinformation about their payment options,” CFPB said in an announcement of the settlement in August.

This report uses material from the Associated Press and Reuters.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Feds levy $185 million fine on Wells Fargo, send message to entire industry
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today