Skip to footer

Justice Department files suit to block Halliburton-Baker Hughes merger, preserve competition

The Justice Department has filed suit to block two of the biggest oilfield services firms from merging.

|
David Zalubowski/AP/File
An unidentified worker passes a truck owned by Halliburton at a remote site for natural-gas producer Williams in Rulison, Colo. (April 15, 2009, file photo). Halliburton is buying rival oilfield services company Baker Hughes in a cash-and-stock deal worth $34.6 billion. The deal comes shortly after talks had stalled and Halliburton prepared to go hostile with its takeover bid.
  • By Erick Tucker and Paul Harloff The Associated Press

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Justice Department on Wednesday sued to stop Halliburton Co. from acquiring oilfield services rival Baker Hughes Inc., saying the deal would eliminate head-to-head competition and harm consumers.

The proposed transaction, valued at nearly $35 billion, would combine two of the world's three leading providers of those services to oil and gas companies and create a bigger rival to the industry leader, Schlumberger Ltd.

But the Justice Department warned in its complaint that the proposed consolidation would lead to higher prices and stifle innovation in an industry that fiercely competes for the business of exploration and production companies and to develop technologies for deeper drilling.

"The U.S. economy, American consumers, and those who engage in the production of energy consumed in the United States cannot be asked to accept the risk to competition posed by this transaction," the department said in its complaint.

The deal would harm competition in 23 separate markets, creating "non-competitive duopolies," Attorney General Loretta Lynch said in a conference call with reporters.

Halliburton and Baker Hughes announced their plan to combine in November 2014, shortly after oil prices began to fall. Few, however, predicted the depth and duration of lower prices caused by a global oversupply of oil.

The glut has slowed demand for drilling services and crushed the stock price of both companies.

In a joint statement Wednesday, the companies called the deal "pro-competitive" and said customers would benefit "from a more flexible, innovative, and efficient oilfield services company.

"The transaction will provide customers with access to high quality and more efficient products and services, and an opportunity to reduce their cost per barrel of oil equivalent," the statement said.

Justice Department officials say the companies were well aware at the time that their proposal raised antitrust concerns but went ahead with it anyway. They say the companies' proposed fix — in which assets and an array of products and services would be sold off — is "complicated and convoluted" and does nothing to address the problem.

"I've seen a lot of problematic mergers in my time, but I have never seen one that poses so many antitrust problems in so many markets," said Assistant Attorney General Bill Baer, head of the Justice Department's antitrust division.

_______________

Copyright 2016 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.
editor@csmonitor.com
Subscribe
Mark Sappenfield
Editor

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

Subscribe to insightful journalism

QR Code to Justice Department files suit to block Halliburton-Baker Hughes merger, preserve competition
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Business/2016/0406/Justice-Department-files-suit-to-block-Halliburton-Baker-Hughes-merger-preserve-competition
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe