Philadelphia Inquirer tests new model, with nonprofit and for-profit benefits

The Philadelphia Media Network, parent of the Inquirer, was donated to a local foundation in a unique structure that allows it to take advantage of both nonprofit and for-profit status.

Rich Schultz/AP
H.F. 'Gerry' Lenfest, owner and Chairman of Philadelphia Media Network (PMN), makes an announcement during a press conference at the National Constitution Center in Philadelphia, Pa., Tuesday Jan. 12, 2016. Lenfest announced that he will be donating PMN, the holding company for The Philadelphia Inquirer, Daily News, and philly.com to a newly created nonprofit media institute.

The 185-year-old Philadelphia Inquirer, the third-oldest newspaper in the United States, has been donated, along with its sister publications – the Philadelphia Daily News and website Philly.com – to the Philadelphia Foundation, a community-focused philanthropy with $370 million in assets.

But this doesn’t mean the parent company of the three news outlets, Philadelphia Media Network (PMN), will become a nonprofit. The tax-exempt structure often gets tossed around the media industry as one path to greater editorial independence (from owners or shareholders) and lower financial pressure (from profits) among newspapers that have been losing advertising revenue and staff.

Instead, says H.F. “Gerry” Lenfest, PMN’s former owner, the media company will remain very much a for-profit business, but a relatively new type called a Benefit Corporation, a legal designation now available in 31 states for profit-making companies that also strive to provide a public good.

One of the benefits of incorporating this way is that it allows companies to reinvest some profits in the corporation instead of passing them to shareholders, according to Mr. Lenfest.

PMN is now owned by the Institute for Journalism in New Media, a new nonprofit journalism training affiliate of the Philadelphia Foundation that Lenfest endowed with $20 million.

This unique and unprecedented restructuring, says Mr. Lenfest to The Christian Science Monitor, will offer the “best of both worlds” to the award-winning news outlets, and it will serve as an interesting experiment for a beleaguered media industry that’s hungry for new business models.

While PMN’s for-profit status will allow it to raise capital, sell advertising, and make political endorsements – activities that are restricted for nonprofits under IRS rules – its affiliation with a nonprofit, the journalism institute, will afford it the benefits of philanthropy status, which include accepting tax-exempt donations and grants.

“Long-term, what Mr. Lenfest has created may very well illuminate a new path forward for other for-profit newspapers to benefit their respective communities through an innovative restructuring that encourages the development of journalism in the digital age,” says PNM in an announcement.

There are nonprofit journalism organizations out there that rely on grants and other types of donations for revenue, such as The Christian Science Monitor, ProPublica, and The Texas Tribune. There is also at least one example of a nonprofit, Poynter Institute, that owns a major for-profit newspaper, the Tampa Bay Times. But the two are financially linked, with overlapping boards.

According to PMN, under the new structure, it will have its own management team and its own board of directors to allow for editorial independence.

The media industry will be eager to watch how the new structure works out in Philadelphia. Though for now, as Philly.com points out, there won’t be any drastic changes.

“This new structure offers no quick fix, no imminent balm to the economic woes that confront legacy news companies. PMN remains a self-governing, for-profit company, needing ultimately to fail or succeed on its journalistic merits and financial performance.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Philadelphia Inquirer tests new model, with nonprofit and for-profit benefits
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Business/2016/0112/Philadelphia-Inquirer-tests-new-model-with-nonprofit-and-for-profit-benefits
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe