Exxon Mobil under fire: Did energy giant withhold climate research?

Law enforcement in New York State is investigating Exxon Mobil and coal company Peabody Corp for concealing financial risks associated with climate change.

Jessica Rinaldi/Reuters/File
The Exxon Mobil refinery in Baytown, Texas, Sept. 15, 2008. The New York attorney general has launched an investigation into whether Exxon Mobil Corp misled the public about the risks of climate change or its investors about how those risks may hurt the company's oil business.

In a new wrinkle to the revelation that Exxon Mobil knew about global warming for about 40 years, New York State’s attorney general is now investigating the company and others to ascertain whether they misled investors on climate change’s causes and ramifications.

After a yearlong examination of shareholder disclosures, a subpoena was sent to Dallas-based Exxon Mobil on Wednesday. Attorney General Eric Schneiderman is conducting a similar investigation into St. Louis-based coal company Peabody Energy Corp.

Scott Silvestri, a spokesman for Exxon Mobil, said the company repudiates any accusations that it concealed research. He said for years, ExxonMobil has provided shareholders with information regarding the financial risk posed by climate change.

He pointed to "Exxon Mobil's nearly 40-year history of climate research that was conducted publicly in conjunction with the Department of Energy, academics and the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change."

"Exxon Mobil recognizes that climate risks are real and responsible actions are warranted," said company vice president Kenneth Cohen on Thursday during a conference call with reporters.

"Beginning in the last decade, we've informed shareholders and investors on our perception of the business risks associated with climate change through regulatory filings, our annual corporate citizenship report and in other reports to shareholders," he added.

According to The New York Times, the attorney general has been investigating Peabody for two years to determine whether it appropriately shared potential financial risks posed by climate change, but no legal action has been taken against the company.  

InsideClimate News, a nonprofit publication, discovered documents showing Exxon realized as far back as the late 1970’s that the company’s own existence was vulnerable to climate change. Later, company researchers confirmed that burning fossil fuels and doubling carbon dioxide emissions would warm the Earth, the documents show.  

The new revelation was first reported by The New York Times on Thursday, which found parallels between the tobacco and fossil fuel industry. Some experts said there is a potential for an all-out legal assault on fossil fuel companies like the kind against big tobacco in past decades, which has cost the industry tens of billions of dollars in penalties. During the 1950’s and ‘60s, tobacco companies knew about the harmful and addictive nature of cigarettes, but publicly defended the safety of their products and even funded research later found to be questionable. Several companies were found guilty of the scheme in 2006.

But, as the Times notes, the history at Exxon Mobil seems different, as the company has published extensive research for decades in the same vein as mainstream climatology. So any fraud prosecution would depend on what role executives may have had in climate denial campaigns.

“Unless they directly lied in Congress, the legal case against them is kind of thin,” Hal Harvey, chief of energy consultancy Energy Innovation, told the Times. But he also said companies “have walked away from being a credible spokesman on science.”

This report contains material from The Associated Press.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Exxon Mobil under fire: Did energy giant withhold climate research?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Business/2015/1106/Exxon-Mobil-under-fire-Did-energy-giant-withhold-climate-research
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe