Major New York City restaurateur ditches tipping. Everybody wins?

Successful New York City restaurant manager Danny Meyer will eliminate tipping to make pay more equitable for all restaurant employees, improve managers' influence, and enhance customers' dining experience. 

Melanie Stetson Freeman/The Christian Science Monitor/File
A waiter works at an outdoor cafe in midtown Manhattan before the lunch rush, on April 11, 2013 in New York, New York. New Yorkers and tourists love to dine out at restaurants.

Restaurateur Danny Meyer announced Wednesday that he will eliminate tipping at all 13 of his New York City restaurants by raising the price of all meals, in a move that he expects will improve the lifestyle of his employees.

Mr. Meyer’s Union Square Hospitality Group includes many popular New York City restaurants, such as Union Square Café, Gramercy Tavern, Blue Smoke, and The Modern, inside the Museum of Modern Art. Beginning in November, customers' checks at these restaurants will say 'hospitality included' and the tip line will be removed from the receipt. 

But this change won't make service free for customers. Diners can expect to see a 30 percent price bump on menu items at Meyer's restaurants. 

“We will now have the ability to compensate all of our employees equitably, competitively, and professionally,” Meyer writes in a press release. “And by eliminating tipping, our employees who want to grow financially and professionally will be able to earn those opportunities based on the merit of their work.”

Meyer further explains his belief that hospitality is a “team sport” and the practice of tipping leaves out servers’ colleagues such as cooks, hostesses, and dishwashers who “aren’t able to share in our guests’ generosity, even though their contributions are just as vital to the outcome of your experience at one of our restaurants.”

Meyer told The New York Times that income for kitchen workers has not increased more than 25 percent during his 30 years in the New York food industry. “Meanwhile, dining-room pay has gone up 200 percent,” he added.

He fears that if this pay gap continues in kitchens across the United States, which is fueled by a law that prevents back of house staff from sharing in pooled tips, then New York City won’t be able “to attract the culinary talent that the city needs to keep its edge.”

But this initiative isn’t entirely unexpected.

Since as early as 1994, Meyer has openly expressed frustration at America’s tipping system. He would prefer the US fully transition to a European or Japanese style of dining where tipping is already included in the price of the meal. If restaurant guests (instead of management) determine staff’s income, Meyer says managers are left without a way to promote and reward particularly excellent service.

“I get to give merit raises based on what kind of job I think you’re doing,” Meyer told the New York Eater. “And I have all kinds of ways to make those judgments now that I’m your boss, and John Q public is not your boss.”

Los Angeles restaurateur Gabriel Frem already made the transition to no-tipping, and told The Christian Science Monitor in January that it will not only help the wait staff, but also improve business.

“We think that if we stabilize the lives of our employees, they can then focus on the customer,” Mr. Frem told The Monitor's Daniel Wood. “If people came to work and didn’t know what they were going to make for the week, that tension would eventually translate to the customer.” 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.