Nokia in advanced talks to buy Alcatel-Lucent

Both companies' chief executives, Nokia's Rajeev Suri and Alcatel-Lucent's Michel Combes, met with French President Hollande briefly on Tuesday afternoon. The French government said it would support the deal.

Roni Rekomaa, Lehtikuva/AP/File
This Thursday, Jan. 29, 2015 file photo shows the Nokia head offices in Espoo, Finland.

Nokia revealed Tuesday it's in advanced talks to buy the ailing French telecoms company Alcatel-Lucent, an apparent bid to become a leading global networks operator.

Hopes for a deal were boosted by news that the French government, which has a history of intervening in takeover attempts by foreign companies, would give its blessing.

In a brief statement, Nokia Corp. said the two companies are in negotiations "with respect to a potential full combination which would take the form of a public exchange offer by Nokia for Alcatel-Lucent."

After plunging 7 percent in Helsinki, Nokia stock was down some 3 percent at 7.46 euros in late trading while Alcatel-Lucent, which has been losing money since its creation in 2006, saw its share price leap more than 16 percent in Paris. That put Alcatel-Lucent's market value at 12.7 billion euros ($13.42 billion).

The Finnish company gave no details of the talks and denied further comment except to say that a further announcement would be made when appropriate.

"Nokia has been reorganizing the business for some time and the networks market is very competitive so it makes real sense to merge the networks," said Neil Mawston from Strategy Analytics near London. "Nokia became a bit of a sprawling mess in the latter years with devices struggling and maps not quite living up to its expectations."

Both companies' chief executives, Nokia's Rajeev Suri and Alcatel-Lucent's Michel Combes, met with French President Hollande briefly on Tuesday afternoon but did not talk to reporters after the meeting. The French government said it would support the deal.

"It's a good operation for Alcatel-Lucent" because it will allow the creation of a "European champion" with "no job cuts" in France, Economy Minister Emmanuel Macron said following the meeting at the Elysee.

Nokia, which began as a maker of paper and gum boots in 1865, transformed into a home electronics firm before becoming an innovator in the wireless industry and the world's top cellphone maker. But it met its match when Apple launched the iPhone and also was unable to compete against Google Inc.'s Android operating system and cheaper handsets from Asia.

Recently, it has made a turnaround since its 5.4 billion-euro sale of the lossmaking handset business to Microsoft a year ago, with three remaining sectors: networks, mapping services and technologies and patents. It expects growth this year in all of them after a good fourth quarter result in 2014, when it reported a net profit of 443 million euros ($502 million) and sales growth of nearly 10 percent to 3.8 billion euros.

Timo Seppala, senior researcher at Aalto University in Helsinki, described such a merger as a clear indication that the company, which makes most of its money from networks, is aiming to be a major player in global network services.

"Nokia wants to be one of the three big ones — a game player alongside China's Huawei and Ericsson (of Sweden)," the market leaders in networks, Seppala said.

Networks, which recorded near-record profits and accounts for 90 percent of Nokia's sales, is expected to book a full-year operating margin of 11 percent, up from the earlier estimate of 5 to 10 percent, according to Suri.

Alcatel-Lucent, which has racked up billions of euros of losses and undergone repeated rounds of restructuring since the 2006 merger of France's Alcatel and U.S.-based Lucent Technologies, said in 2013 that it plans to lay off 10,000 workers. Last year it made a net loss of 118 million euros.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.