Facebook sued by law student Max Schrems for privacy violations

Facebook is facing a class-action lawsuit from Max Schrems, an Austrian law student and data privacy activist who announced Friday that he will sue social networking site. Mr. Schrems claims Facebook violated Europe's privacy laws and its own terms of agreement during its participation in NSA spying programs. 

Provided by Europe v. Facebook
Max Schrems, an Austrian law student, announced Friday that he will be bringing a class action lawsuit against Facebook for violating privacy laws in Europe.

Facebook went down briefly in the US Friday morning, but it faces a more lingering snafu in Europe.

An Austrian man is fronting a class action lawsuit against Facebook for violations of European privacy laws. Law student Max Schrems announced today that he is suing Facebook subsidiary Facebook Ireland in a commercial court in Vienna, Austria. 

Mr. Schrems is bringing the lawsuit against Facebook for violations regarding: “[t]he privacy policy, participation in the PRISM program, Facebook’s graph search, apps on Facebook, tracking on other web pages (e.g. via the “like buttons”), ‘big data’ systems that spy on users or the non-compliance with access requests,” according to the group’s website FBClaim.com.

“We see that Facebook is violating EU privacy laws for a very long time and wanted to take action. The problems start with a privacy policy that no one understands, [which is] invalid under EU law, up to the NSA spying scandal,” the group said on in a statement to the Monitor. Since Facebook Ireland is headquartered in Dublin, the company falls under the European Union’s jurisdiction. 

Schrems has a long history of campaigning for online privacy in Europe. He became aware of Facebook's privacy issues during a semester abroad at Santa Clara University, when Facebook privacy lawyer Ed Palmieri visited a class he was taking. During the visit, Mr. Palmieri's lack of knowledge about European privacy laws was shocking, Schrems said in an interview with Forbes. Soon after, he created the group Europe v. Facebook, which has since brought separate complaints against Facebook, Microsoft, and Google.

In 2011, the group brought administrative complaints to the Irish Data Protection Commissioner regarding users' ability to obtain data on themselves and the use of a facial recognition system. The complaints led to users being allowed to obtain more data about themselves and the discontinued use of the facial recognition software in Europe.

The European Court of Justice, the highest court in Europe, is currently considering the final complaint about the legality of the National Security Administrations' use of the mass collection of electronic surveillance data known as the PRISM program. According to the group, the complaint will be decided within the next two years. This is the same court that ruled Google must remove unwanted information about people from its search engine, better known as the "right to be forgotten."

Schrems has been such a problem for Facebook that  in 2012, the company sent its European director of policy Richard Allan and an unidentified California-based executive to meet with him for a six-hour discussion regarding privacy laws in the EU, according to Forbes.

The current class-action suit is available to Facebook users outside the US and Canada. Those looking to join can register at FBClaim.com using Facebook login information. If the case goes the way of the plaintiff, an award of 500 euros, about $670, would be awarded per user.

“We love to complain constantly about data protection problems in Europe, now its also time for us to enforce our fundamental rights,” Schrems said in a press release. “Within the framework of this class action individuals can also make a contribution to this effort.” 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.