Delphi (DLPH) CEO O'Neal says ignition switch problem is GM's fault

The CEO of Delphi, the manufacturer of defective ignition switches, said General Motors is the one to blame for the ignition problem responsible for at least 13 deaths. During the her fourth Congressional hearing, GM CEO Mary Barra said the automaker is doing everything it can to correct the the problem and compensate victims.

|
Gary Cameron/Reuters
General Motors general counsel Michael Millikin (L-R), Chief Executive Mary Barra, Delphi Automotive Chief Executive Rodney O'Neal and attorney Anton Valukas testify before the Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Subcommittee in Washington July 17, 2014. GM's legal department came under fire in the Senate hearing on Thursday, as lawmakers questioned why the automaker took more than 10 years to recall cars with ignition switch flaws while its lawyers worked on numerous cases involving deaths or injury caused by the malfunctioning switch.

The manufacturer of the switch at the center of GM's ignition switch debacle is placing the blame squarely on GM. 

During a hearing in front of Congress Thursday, the chief executive of Dephi Automotive (DLPH), the auto supplier that supplied defective ignition switches, said that General Motors (GM) is to blame for approving the faulty part design. 

During his testimony to lawmakers, Delphi CEO Rodney O'Neal said his company made "the switch that GM approved and wanted," according to Reuters. The faulty ignition switches are attributed to 13 deaths and 54 crashes. The ignition switch can slip from the "run" to "accessory" setting, which causes the engine to stall, the air bags not to deploy, and loss of power brakes and power steering.

"GM knowingly approved a final design that included less torque than the original target," he said to members of a Senate subcommittee. "In our view, that approval established the final specification." Delphi has shipped more than 1 million new switches to replace the faulty parts that GM recalled.

Members of Congress also grilled  GM CEO Mary Barra for the fourth time. During the hearing, Barra  tried  to set a clear line as to how much the company is willing to do and not do in responding to the controversy. Ms. Barra said GM will not extend its compensation program for victims and added that the company will not share any more documents from the internal investigation. However, Barra said GM wouldn't waive its protection from lawsuits, which was an option because of the company's bankruptcy reorganization. 

“We are going to fix our mistakes and we are going to be a better, stronger company,” Barra said.

But lawmakers didn't think Barra's answers went far enough.

“You’ve provided answers that, I think, for me are unsatisfactory,” Senator Richard Blumenthal, Democrat of Connecticut, said. 

By the end of June GM had recalled 29 million cars in North America – more than the auto industry has recalled annually during any of the past nine years. To compensate victims, GM has set up a compensation program run by attorney Kenneth Feinberg. So far, the automaker has set aside $2.5 billion to pay for recall cost. That number doesn't include the cost of compensating victims. Mr. Feinberg said at Thursday's hearing the company has no limits to the amount GM will pay to victims.

Barra wasn't the only GM employee in the hot seat. GM general counsel Michael P. Millikin, who has worked at GM for 37 years, was questioned by lawmakers about how GM's lawyers failed to inform him that lawsuits about the deaths allegedly caused by the defective switches were likely. Many lawmakers have called for Mr. Millikin to be dismissed from the company.

“It is clear that the culture of lawyering up and Whac-a-Mole to minimize liabilities in individual lawsuits killed customers of General Motors,” said Senator Claire McCaskill, Democrat of Missouri and chairwoman of the subcommittee.

“Lawyers have consistently brought safety concerns to my attention, including some of the lawyers who were let go,” Mr. Millikin said. “For some reason that did not happen here.”

As about a dozen families of accident victims watched the hearing, Barra agreed with lawmakers that GM needed to make dramatic changes to its safety procedures.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Delphi (DLPH) CEO O'Neal says ignition switch problem is GM's fault
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Business/2014/0718/Delphi-DLPH-CEO-O-Neal-says-ignition-switch-problem-is-GM-s-fault
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe