Clippers for sale? Six potential celebrity buyers.

As the NBA begins the likely messy process of forcing Donald Sterling to sell his team after giving him a lifetime league ban and a $2.5 million fine, a big question looms:  If the NBA and its owners can get Sterling to sell, who will be the new Clippers owner? Several famous names have already thrown their hats into the ring, including sports superstars, titans of entertainment and business, and a former child actor. 

2. Magic Johnson

Neil Barris/The Saginaw News/AP/File
Businessman and former NBA star Magic Johnson smiles while speaking to members of the media during a press conference Tuesday, April 29, 2014, in Saginaw, Mich.

Job: Basketball player (retired), business mogul (active)

Net worth: $500 million

What would make him a good owner? Few are more universally beloved in basketball or the Los Angeles sports scene.  Mr. Sterling’s taped comments were partially directed at Mr. Johnson, so him having an ownership stake in Sterling’s former team would be an interesting cap to the whole affair.

Additionally, he has the financial backing to make the buy. He is part of the Guggenheim Group, which bought the Los Angeles Dodgers for $2 billion in 2012.  The only problem? He’s tightly associated with the Clippers’ in-town rival, the Lakers, for whom he played his entire NBA career.

Johnson took to Twitter on April 28 to deny reports that he was trying to buy the team. For now, at least:

“To NBA Fans, I want to put a stop to a rumor. I am not trying to buy the Clippers, they already have an owner,” he said.

But not for long, if the NBA has its way. 

2 of 5

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.